On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:50 AM Thompson, David wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 8:44 AM Efraim Flashner wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 07:11:54AM -0400, Thompson, David wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 3:00 AM Efraim Flashner wrote: > > > > > > > > I took a look at the gitolite service finally and I hadn't realized > > > > there wasn't a running daemon to containerize. I assumed we could do > > > > something like: > > > > > > > > (start $~(make-forkexec-constructor/container > > > > (list ...) > > > > #:environment-variables > > > > '("PATH=...") > > > > #:mappings ...)) > > > > > > > > Given that's not the case then I'd need to look at gitolite itself to > > > > see how it calls the other binaries it expects to be available, and if > > > > wrapping it would be enough or if we would need to just propagate the > > > > other packages for functionality. > > > > > > Gitolite simply expects tools like git to be on $PATH. It's a pretty > > > naive system, there's nothing like a configure script that is > > > determining the absolute file name of these tools and substituting > > > those names into the built files. > > > > > > The executable is already wrapped so that coreutils, findutils, and > > > git are on $PATH, but notably not openssh: > > > > > > (add-after 'install 'wrap-scripts > > > (lambda* (#:key inputs outputs #:allow-other-keys) > > > (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")) > > > (coreutils (assoc-ref inputs "coreutils")) > > > (findutils (assoc-ref inputs "findutils")) > > > (git (assoc-ref inputs "git"))) > > > (wrap-program (string-append out "/bin/gitolite") > > > `("PATH" ":" prefix > > > ,(map (lambda (dir) > > > (string-append dir "/bin")) > > > (list out coreutils findutils git))))))) > > > > > > However, git and openssh are still propagated inputs. I'm going to > > > move the propagated inputs to regular inputs, potentially add openssh > > > to the wrapper once I remind myself what gitolite does with those > > > tools, and test it all out on my server using the gitolite service. > > > If that all works, we have a good starting point for adding extension > > > support in the service. > > > > I like it. Let us know how it goes. > > The problem is that gitolite generates git hooks for the repositories > that it manages, and those hooks invoke git, so the only way those > scripts will be able to work (without input propagation) is to find a > way to inject the proper PATH or find a way to replace references to > things like 'git diff' with '/gnu/store/.../git diff'. I'm going to > keep exploring and report back when I have something to show. After several rounds of experimentation and breaking my git server a few times, here's what I've found: * Changing git and openssh to be regular inputs and wrapping both gitolite and gitolite-shell with a $PATH that contains git works and it's very little extra code. * Trying to replace every invocation of a git command took a lot of grepping and crafting of regexps to use for substitute* and I never got to a point where the result wasn't buggy. In particular, gitolite-shell never worked properly so I couldn't push to my repos. So, I think the simple wrapper approach is the way to go. Patch attached. I tested on my git server by making changes to my gitolite configuration and pushing those changes to the special gitolite-admin repo. This causes gitolite to refresh internal configuration using a git hook, so I know that hooks can find the executables they need. That plus the 'gitolite setup' invocation made by the service activation script covers a fair amount of surface area, so I feel comfortable committing it. What do you think? Once this part is done, I'll turn my attention to the optional extensions. - Dave