From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id wGWfCMzvWV8jJQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:20:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wPF2BMzvWV/5RgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:20:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F2B3940221 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34834 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGIkT-0004Dq-AU for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:20:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGIkM-0004D0-5C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:20:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGIkL-0007Sr-R9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:20:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGIkL-00009s-NX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:20:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43075: Prioritize providing substitutes for security-critical packages with potentially long build times Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43075 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 43075-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43075.1599729569525 (code B ref 43075); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:20:01 +0000 Received: (at 43075) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2020 09:19:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36661 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGIjp-00008O-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:19:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com ([209.85.222.178]:37237) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kGIjn-000089-GQ for 43075@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 05:19:27 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id 16so5371279qkf.4 for <43075@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXZ0iCBRsljHRHuQo1otyzREKsQ5XigfwZz2LiabM38=; b=ZNOj6h2GEggEkcM3HyaVJSn0r/F94uSEzGewOUACrZfLIz5ihhadGxldSTjyNhWcVw uh3NkAITi9o2yPfCpN7P0WdC46aOHq1DS1L/NalElFzusIjMvXpmZ9CCgmRmvHZ0Vgmr FwMGoPmhtUom2xX1wgWUNpjwaCLAyoArTWT2Nk7yPGspuecBRsuiCg6IRzS9eUtS5Xf7 nmgvm1Zi/aiO2DYkmKDUqe0VEY+8IRcz4yDV9IC8dMj9Qh0DcdPZkTMG2IqWHNdXtv2R 5rv+GjwS/6KUjB4RUuk6ggDLWE1FFxpTtVS9dZAM2U4LVcM/kZLlCS2OVnYG2IE91fwS h/Ww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nXZ0iCBRsljHRHuQo1otyzREKsQ5XigfwZz2LiabM38=; b=K5RpVQBBZpcN/R5fLxoMBuSXAAv8wLIdsNVwM9mIBxJxK+zX3lXBMzRTVcrQ+BeCyU XEOR/N4a2IY///+pJ/YXHLWUi3scM+DImtegR/XNVzIYXV+BcpQvI9p11xDNJhdZ6fw+ VIAeWKHjh8FF7ufutHYH8IVjv321of3BX2r4mxzzpH8q2wqUdtKsY+WBNvIX9+nuEpFt zpA3jAz32thkMilIKT+tN7b9MLdDW7Az7TUxRyF5ueGO7guVyaBq+I/98ZQKV1ng+y3x RFpToeidRT2sfBTAvYUD3eZAOJf2iwmDmGf3Rz7O9BTB+a1Vms0AbC0fhh+VaNxn+N/g 9Ytg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531bFyMhVMWePxzO7QkXvWRFPdE9fKCiPzff1wwrsHZpN0K1mHVk WqxFKcCC8iygqYgYykm1NmARb2OYEg1tYNG5OM0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzY0OvK+sAwCt4ttoy18ojuw+2+V0stCyCSA6QqytGzIpIe0CRwS8i4O59CJLtpkl0tkmIXb8tvv1kHtplVy20= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:53a:: with SMTP id h26mr6946766qkh.232.1599729562019; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 02:19:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2WPQFQ.3JQYOGZG7WXZ@riseup.net> <87bliejc3j.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87bliejc3j.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:19:11 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 43075@debbugs.gnu.org, chaosmonk Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZNOj6h2G; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: TFP9jFlmswss Hi, On Thu, 10 Sep 2020 at 10:01, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > chaosmonk skribis: > > I don't know what Guix's CI system looks like or how packages are > > queued for building, but if there is a way to prioritize builds for > > certain packages, I propose that substitutes for packages like > > ungoogled-chromium should be built as soon as possible once there is a > > new version. Other security-critical packages with potentially long > > build times that come to mind are icecat and linux-libre. > Right now we=E2=80=99re trying to improve build throughput in general but= your > proposal makes sense, of course. The recent updates of ungoogled-chromium do not mention [security updates]. Well, I do not know if they are. So the question would be: what triggers the special security build? Well, the work-in-progress [1] about some metrics of Cuirass (Guix's CI) would provide interesting answers on the concrete feasibility and future improvements. [1] http://issues.guix.gnu.org/32548#1 All the best, simon