From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id QPpUIMakAmUZBwAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:14:30 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id QPpUIMakAmUZBwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:14:30 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60B4F58306 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=WJ3K5K+N; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694672065; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=INZI4iLKDSVYF8sd4nkMz5BPvfcCbLjgY8JrQJ7orNs=; b=tWV9qCAHxfnSBH8P8kEutHWH4412KHTRw6lDD3EI8XM8hZYuDW/13xR8GV+YiTQoXp4u7t FaTLRQFo/e7PkZtyOZL3GbK82SiOFur0PkjdLbDNE59H2M7z3ceNXOn1q2T1oEwxxtDpB4 nB8qyCZv0xqCBs+kJcxHKBOfKgbKIjqiur0L/fpTvMUB36Xq5tzDGdPwlJS+YKcLTcz60X w565F/ENWtrUXgAg42AMpu5hzToh+SH2FpgJcniKwQrRB+Tmm12MZxfd93d5v228eTTxwA bUpfYqyVdaZXRp7eudu7Rpe0j1lQ8hHXfmVE/wv4voKUD6f5Cn2UhmlfvAH2Ng== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=WJ3K5K+N; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694672065; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=MQ61jXdexwsaI6ad9tHLrXbpWnfj9cYptLd0Bh65KnjBPb5dUL5Y2sXoyTkrZTHAWwlWHK OFcwrglU7WhoAx8mScfDkK179eUxlvJWBShF4HCulebwNUdcdETuxAbjX3P6xH5Wkx6O4X WnuLJd6AOaqDF4LbAE2fXRpL8vPMljS/M25hhta7sUCczD6QjFFrcvXvmK3Rdqb/MN00Kp KH1jpJma4RmLEecLVwtdvWJ0vLG2gzHcRhNeantydFjxVg4Gd1SgEsiG3xsB52L7pvNbv7 GuRmpBlwnQuDjsXSiggqtmcFcMtQquAin5k+4PXcz3MjT55ug4fPOpzfvCAsmQ== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfbx-0001Jg-TI; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:13:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfbw-0001J5-LH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:13:56 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfbw-0007g4-D1 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:13:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfc2-0005BT-0x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65924: git searches coreutils and util-linux commands in PATH Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:14:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65924 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 65924@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 65924-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65924.169467199619868 (code B ref 65924); Thu, 14 Sep 2023 06:14:01 +0000 Received: (at 65924) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2023 06:13:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36623 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfbI-0005AO-5G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:13:16 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::233]:38044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qgfbF-0005AA-Lp for 65924@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 02:13:14 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x233.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bfcb39037dso571071fa.0 for <65924@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 23:13:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694671982; x=1695276782; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=INZI4iLKDSVYF8sd4nkMz5BPvfcCbLjgY8JrQJ7orNs=; b=WJ3K5K+NpY5sD93wMqnpt7vqHA+4YUBNxu4anb64WkLnaLtkdzSOucx1vy8ew1IGqn dfjdtH3IlaPTeGCTSZ9MBvSgwm0A9J0Si2HdmRIa4HNoIcgtkzNKheZhXWejG4GWiaQi qmimOSVil2HtNPNLSL/6jcVFun5bQOD+c+6xyif/zuWmMWO3huEzN229ng8Ow1PNtC/M pb3mEvHDXVSVUNsu2gULwmmPSvC4iStJupYXYKQ0xcI3Ep/6rWf+NxZe4Cebaz543Za5 Y9Twklp2qo8jCvu0YK99WhebJn4ZimO6qUmULsVNsOBpErauCyTE91vzxCyy0/NjYLUA GaBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694671982; x=1695276782; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=INZI4iLKDSVYF8sd4nkMz5BPvfcCbLjgY8JrQJ7orNs=; b=K3Ge76CsRSSNMMaJxB+xzYVckgYi72RUmgGNTHR7vhY8k0MRVG1/juNTRuuIVDqgGn vjgKyCW7Bflj0wQdhA76p/wQz8kVjArJcZR7+CU6X8WgrGk/0FGNpgGSsyCrCoAUpBHQ legBzG+pEBdA9K4Vm6AqUaxGVJlk0BLwlMSl0FH1jD5IiPn1QOnLYmnUSaEjA9zwbhMh ukVNX7fWTUz9SIRFJewmj7EoABFw68Zt7vMu++JnSUPDp7mAbyAKWaTaSpdErcsXKoOk LVFxpJXTbVDcg+ndJ5wziuP4auxl8ikdoewyP9T2uN3CpBnGa7Pkwgmc8QankVwBIGl7 4zwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwnhdmeZ2ATE9t7cxJ3VOTeS0trWwqU+gfWQ93ChQEoVh3bBtBu vNI9Nf9s8wmXIjjdZKOgYYWrUYmg+A/Qbl87wPI/+0P+Qq4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHxFMp5fiMzMk5IbhRy0rGgnSGM3/bDjfCF1pMNGCG6Qu0qS9pfiAFLfs62UOCapceLFdgGoTtpG85qSlKXTOg= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a7cd:0:b0:2bf:7908:ae73 with SMTP id x13-20020a2ea7cd000000b002bf7908ae73mr5317847ljp.2.1694671981722; Wed, 13 Sep 2023 23:13:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87fs3iuf6e.fsf@gmail.com> <86v8cdwvx1.fsf@gmail.com> <87y1h9tphx.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87y1h9tphx.fsf@gmail.com> From: Simon Tournier Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 08:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.31 X-Spam-Score: -0.31 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 60B4F58306 X-TUID: 2jvJP/FS8hm/ Hi, On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 05:14, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > > $ guix size git-minimal > > [...] > > total: 147.8 MiB > > > > $ guix size git-minimal util-linux coreutils > > [...] > > total: 195.4 MiB > > > > It increases the size by 33% which is not nothing. :-) [...] > > The question could be: is worth to add 33% for these commands? [...] > References are also found in bin/git in your search, which suggests > perhaps the size of git-minimal is a "lie" (the core package is not > fully functional). Only coreutils is about 165.1 MiB so 12% which is better than 33% but not nothing either; especially if git-mininal becomes an hard dependency of Guix (as proposed in e.g. patch##65866 [1]). Another fix could be that git-minimal does not provide the "git submodule" subcommand for example; or other ones. I have not considered that yet and I am not plainly proposing that; somehow I would like to avoid to have a git-minimal that would not be really "minimal" for features that are not minimalist :-) Cheers, simon 1: [bug#65866] [PATCH 0/8] Add built-in builder for Git checkouts Ludovic Court=C3=A8s Mon, 11 Sep 2023 16:23:42 +0200 id:cover.1694441830.git.ludo@gnu.org https://issues.guix.gnu.org//65866 https://issues.guix.gnu.org/msgid/cover.1694441830.git.ludo@gnu.org https://yhetil.org/guix/cover.1694441830.git.ludo@gnu.org