From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GrwxKp4ihF//AgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:32:14 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id aEmDJZ4ihF+xWQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:32:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421F1940394 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:32:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRuBg-00049P-Rb for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:32:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRuBX-00049D-D0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:32:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kRuBW-0007l5-Dg for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:32:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kRuBW-0000Mj-9v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43843: git-annex is not Reproducible Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43843 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Received: via spool by 43843-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43843.16024951121390 (code B ref 43843); Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 43843) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Oct 2020 09:31:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41724 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kRuBM-0000MM-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:31:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com ([209.85.222.181]:39376) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kRuBK-0000M7-JN for 43843@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 05:31:50 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id k9so2898346qki.6 for <43843@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 02:31:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KuGoK0qZk2XNRsOT6Xr+VZjOM35Yg/936Jaa9kjwB6o=; b=dK3EVmBy9IRRtjn2bKEGB5b7WAU9ZtjbUEym8fWBNdmTHHNCIPUkkiGxcxHw4Ikegj CpD6STkZWHYm8VLVAfDo1hTWfFcBZIXOdRiHxyjX4dXKK1hiRAwq14JGSN2c+pek+GBT e53nFde4azAixdNlLGpd2wxjAuOJZQ3+x2Ga4lPkTb4jbnBB5JzFH0569Avy0y6W9nKg 2jwU7G6jmR0gv5rdzlhfELSEL4hxpTqQVf1CdXHfyhP4dI07pGkgyhsvIrfKeayAWU/S BGMsQJG6IH25kpH5fhqcCzXSvPjrHXR2waMvtJqt4oWebpoL7EF3GgVTvEIy0JvFdTqH c8kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KuGoK0qZk2XNRsOT6Xr+VZjOM35Yg/936Jaa9kjwB6o=; b=jlyP4Xm4OmlFA1gpcyiaIr0t0V9GJUxhBch6Erg52RLI6zj4ExH3kceOcaB73PboHe ngxqQUO6DakftY7pQyQK6hSTTf+ep8cawjexRr8vABTK9dbkI55NluG+2qf5BK+2WKNk 9zMifTvSQl4TW80QokcotLoeuKRdBIvP5Ae3nJ/PBbxmaLdNaROLmVxpwVJEpGn8gfuA bh/b53eWbDEUhEAJdZpMCeF+TqZvbHW7BQW8WPGECcKtKXofBuTvgJ7cUHGJELbojbT7 60A+MvQLeX8NU4mbpoMvYSggTl7e9RT65fD78NPBRXAwQq43/iMvo/bm6oSs2FQgmhBV k5lA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531e0fkP4KE9jF+9LvzZle80ZY3xUPBOaeJAkqZirGFv/MKWBs58 9s59pw68RrDYMgBwJkwNOpguYTEVgrgJc0dCdJI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNLp7DTMmGuQlalTQP4a32KxsDe3dnaVyF5nRHl4zYDzSEKcHeQAnrTyUnXrZExfwmyQXHzSmKFA/Xy1BOlkI= X-Received: by 2002:a37:ac11:: with SMTP id e17mr8939689qkm.232.1602495104919; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 02:31:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87zh4y8gs8.fsf@gmail.com> <87blhdv2oi.fsf@kyleam.com> <20201008061713.GM21174@E5400> <86imbjqguw.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6wuzamh.fsf@elephly.net> In-Reply-To: <87a6wuzamh.fsf@elephly.net> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:31:33 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 43843@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=dK3EVmBy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: PgUrPzeotPWq On Sat, 10 Oct 2020 at 11:34, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > > 67cb9fa2357026ee42ec5bb0923ec4dc4a43abe2 is the first bad commit > > commit 67cb9fa2357026ee42ec5bb0923ec4dc4a43abe2 > > Author: Ricardo Wurmus > > Date: Tue Jun 16 22:25:48 2020 +0200 > > > > build-system/haskell: Support parallel builds. > > > > * guix/build-system/haskell.scm (haskell-build): Add keyword > > PARALLEL-BUILD? > > and pass it on to the builder. > > * guix/build/haskell-build-system.scm (build): Accept keyword > > PARALLEL-BUILD? > > and pass the number of parallel jobs to GHC. > > > > guix/build-system/haskell.scm | 2 ++ > > guix/build/haskell-build-system.scm | 7 +++++-- > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > bisect run success > > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Shall we revert it? Previously the build system also supported parallel > builds, but didn=E2=80=99t seem to pass the right arguments to actually m= ake it > happen. What do the Haskellers think about that? Does the parallel build save a lot of time and CPU? If yes, maybe we could to provide a transformation for the expert, something like "haskell-build-system-with-parellel-build" which tweaks "PARALLEL-BUILD?", similarly to the recent "no tests". WDYT? All the best, simon