From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: bug#39023: binary installation manual doesn't work on Alpine Linux Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 16:56:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4678e0a6a529877fee91a452424115c1@disroot.org> <87ftg89mfd.fsf@nckx> <87lfpzfel9.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35073) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Rih-0000tg-Qe for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:57:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Rig-0007EG-P6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:57:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Rig-0007EA-Io for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j4Rig-0004uB-G7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:57:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: symphonia@disroot.org, 39023@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, I am a bit confused. At the end, what is the fix? >From my knowledge, 'useradd/groupadd ' are the standard commands. The other ones, not. Personally, I am in favour of the option a/ that is described here [1]: write in the manual in a footnote it should be adapted for the underlining distro, i.e., mention 'adduser/addgroup'. Tobias mentioned [2] an option /d: provide in addition of the existing one a complete example using 'adduser/addgroup'. But then Tobias sent this message [3] explaining that BusyBox is doing wrong. ;-) Which IMHO leads to the option a/. :-) What is the consensus for the bug? [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39023#11 [2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39023#17 [3] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39023#26 All the best, simon