From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#39204: r-rgdal: Reading of vector GIS data causes segfault
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 16:49:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ1daHuxDk55eJAorAf-KepxdP003ywu-czYiMsFO9thoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20200120154302.ijni47ou4fk4wd77@wzguix>
 <CAJ3okZ2=gYbTTHoYtn=d+mJjorzqYgHYZGwdF=4KrG2_zSJBvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ3okZ0jVL9B-SjH63=LXZ-79=t00Ppb_dwyU_XxcS381MJUAw@mail.gmail.com>
 <cu7tv3lrxpq.fsf@systemreboot.net>
 <CAJ3okZ2D3Us4p3hKMZBrnFbwJRrSpZkHkX_OZY_3Yhb_9pwn-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <cu71rqnsjp3.fsf@systemreboot.net>
 <CAJ3okZ0y2yAoFR-tXgqbAQ08DCnqqrRd=6RmMwXJ7szQ0c0L5Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <cu7sgj2quhy.fsf@systemreboot.net>
 <CAJ3okZ1hRcxu-0_OGJVbffprDMD20Kq7KYGaHqQAcP-xAoyG=Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <cu77e0bredk.fsf@systemreboot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35436)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j6cTD-0004Yc-4u
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:50:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j6cTB-00050W-UU
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:50:03 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50041)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j6cTB-00050Q-Qj
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:50:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j6cTB-00056V-KH
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:50:01 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39204.B39204.158264579219588@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <cu77e0bredk.fsf@systemreboot.net>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Cc: 39204@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Arun,

On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 20:10, Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net> wrote:

> > But as we have talked before, there is an issue about the upstream
> > test suite of the package (point 1. of [1]). So I am investigating...
>
> Ah, I understand our miscommunication now. You have been talking about
> point 1 (bug in upstream test suite) and I've been talking about point 2
> (segmentation fault when loading vector data). Yes, replacing proj.4
> with proj only addresses point 2, not point 1.

It is not segfaulting anymore, I agree.
But is it enough to know that everything is ok and the package is not broken?

I am mean looking at the output of the 'check' phase (see [1]), it
displays a diff and I am not confident if it is good or not. That's
why I did not confirm that changing from proj.4 to proj works. Maybe I
mispelled "error" in my previous answer and the correct words seem "I
get an lengthy message and I do not know if it is ok." :-)


[1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=39204#26


Cheers,
simon