From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:56:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87y2t7j54n.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeuy2mua.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2t5a3ks.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42989) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2Yed-0002Ei-0C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:57:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2Yeb-0000sw-S6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:57:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2Yeb-0000ss-PA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:57:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j2Yeb-00029H-Nq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 05:57:01 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87y2t5a3ks.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Giovanni Biscuolo Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Giovanni, On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 11:07, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > > The problem here is really that we fall back to content-addressed > > mirrors instead of using them directly: > > > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659 > > Given the natute (AFAIU) of this issue is the very same of the bug you > mention, shouldn't this bug be merged (forcemerged?) whith #28659? AFAIU, there is 2 issues: 1. how to do with the particular case of harfbuzz -- bug#39575 2. how to solve the general case of unreliable sources -- bug#28659 So instead of merging the bugs (case 2.), I would like to solve 1., mark it as done and report to bug#28659. It will ease to follow because the thread in bug#28659 is already heavy. :-) All the best, simon