From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CDilAe+/YV95UgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:34:07 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id WPmFN+6/YV9CLgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:34:06 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B210940215 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45178 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIRx5-0003vJ-V6 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:34:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIRw8-0002xI-7I for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:33:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIRw6-0007N0-O8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:33:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIRw6-00041H-Le for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:33:02 -0400 Subject: bug#25638: [Hunting]: linux libre 4.4.18 tarball has disappeared Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 25638 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Mail-Followup-To: 25638@debbugs.gnu.org, zimon.toutoune@gmail.com, rekado@elephly.net Received: via spool by 25638-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D25638.160024157415431 (code D ref 25638); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:33:02 +0000 Received: (at 25638-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 07:32:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIRvy-00040p-5y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:32:54 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com ([209.85.222.172]:46578) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIRvw-00040c-2j for 25638-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:32:53 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id f142so7164355qke.13 for <25638-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:32:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=15YqdghjH0NiVRZsZf5MMU2kiPy9Bsiu1BypJgDq3lA=; b=FooyvDaOeXgS1jp9uhRs4cV5UFeNF+Zx+dh2GXBwY/WybL9MtK0uviPN6rJcEj6df6 gMFAsWbbQM+3xbx3f5+lH6W8DsCTVdHoHT5R18OT3VZX/jqsw2gHowxlRrfdCqectxHk m05hZhYr/g0kpUJi3cWKXJC3oLX3essFLZ3yV8de8QIL1JW+Tsv6wOqdvj2gu7O7SrZz Hbo+yIjbQo7bpun3q7xMboxooBF7tYbuda0ze/jhRTaqps41qFTPatw6IwXKj88pYibZ u7Kr/0r9dKDiae8boLOVaApUm7Uezz2ISW+SvJ0Dk1/9Ydv7XRwmUdrOL2Sacrbz61vP 9lNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=15YqdghjH0NiVRZsZf5MMU2kiPy9Bsiu1BypJgDq3lA=; b=K57jiGl6n8xyV97QEFUdQsmD4zk88awwxMaAnjyK9NQEMtIY1N0LBH3PirvmGFhDN8 lRjqfbfdIxhkLGE0MxAWsdMN2eV5N7pCyR/UVEU8/JPHBqcK2SZ2kKjO84Ps0mxqfiqp FKeER8gz1iD5WWODqNtjk20HwMsX0wAAn/Tg7lcrHWYAm97ITsi2gul8o9PkCRlmSiJF p/TaREU7RIi+mIAZj4ivJrk0DYl/ar+AmmMOymkigT6u+MUIEYMJyLDmG4wd5jDwotXs vk4eKOE17Qnk0qbEjuUUFOBbx5nOZCUQzV7VU9j6RvwynjyeUFhjbwPL3jrHm+/G/4FT WqcA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531F+PFfO0XFzhZHB0ZfB8yTwjIRseBO5aoEXsT0IpgmuKCL4Xur L+LdPGdzF2VZnViclCE4j0SqBYkov43iWj0OFZc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGmUbvhBcQ4Cca749vtoN42Wy2ni4FQ/fVy8JM0R2ZC71ly20/VHXO6KqUpF4KVYBihzkSmX/wewL0AeZ8e9U= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a5ca:: with SMTP id o193mr21191609qke.126.1600241566566; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:32:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87r33bm1jj.fsf@elephly.net> <87h946ceqb.fsf@gnu.org> <86mu1rypez.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87d02mswud.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87d02mswud.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 09:32:35 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 25638-done@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=FooyvDaO; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: CAhN+NhKy1yD On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 at 20:45, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > It=E2=80=99s available from > > now (found a copy at hydra.gnunet.org!). (This URL is served by =E2=80= =98guix > publish=E2=80=99.) There=E2=80=99s no GC root though. Thank you for explaining. I did not know about hydra.gnunet.org, cool! :-) > > Is such version reachable with "guix time-machine"? I guess no, so doe= s > > it make sense to keep the tarball? > > Good question, maybe not. Well, Guix could keep all the tarballs until the Tarball Heritage is up. :-= ) > > Such issue is discussed in #42162, especially the thread starting here: > > > > [...] > > Therefore, if the linux-libre 4.4.18 tarballs is substituable on > > , I suggest to close this bug. WDYT? > > Yeah, we can probably close it. The more general issue of tarballs in > general, and linux-libre tarballs in particular, can be dealt with in > the issue above. I am closing. Feel free to reopen if I am making a mistake. All the best, simon