From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: bug#39204: r-rgdal: Reading of vector GIS data causes segfault Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 23:19:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20200120154302.ijni47ou4fk4wd77@wzguix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40946) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5GfP-0002Al-OF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:21:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5GfO-0003uy-Ro for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:21:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42336) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5GfO-0003uq-O4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:21:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j5GfO-0007Ie-Js for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 17:21:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Arun Isaac Cc: 39204@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 22:40, Arun Isaac wrote: > > You mean: > > > > guix build --with-input=proj.4=proj r-rgdal > > > > then it compiles a lot... and I do not understand why gdal is > > recompiled. Anyway! > > Your command recursively replaces proj.4 with proj. So, some dependency > of gdal might have been modified resulting in a rebuild of gdal. Yes, but gdal already depends on proj and not proj.4. Then I examined the graph and did not find the offending package. That's why I do not understand why gdal is recompiled. I mean, let find the intersection between "guix graph gdal" and "guix graph -t reverse-package proj.4", and I do not understand because I find it empty. > > Therefore, I do not confirm, I guess. > > I don't understand. With proj instead of proj.4, it does work, doesn't > it? There are no errors and the check phase succeeds. I have try to replace proj.4 by proj in the inputs field and I get the same error. Well, it does not work for me. Maybe I am doing a mistake. Cheers, simon