From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id uKVdCISPGWWkHQAAauVa8A:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 17:25:56 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id uKVdCISPGWWkHQAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 17:25:56 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDF755213 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 17:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MMMk6Zbr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1696173956; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0emxUY2Mx81P1MPqpcjfpshWWND5A+nqa7ArOwsT3kA=; b=T3bpxzS/IYzLtVljAelu7e+O2OGjjltRHBrWRhhJ+Mktul6B00HdFS/5/b4b8OrwJ42lOu roUaG4GufXJQ5kOmnQeyCjHcRXZHnLmUvzAxnlx0BubQ43Ma3wbfgGlnEdBXbWfeG6Hmah lDjKaWoL0tOHqrp3Dwur9UTC9Oxg1mn8AvWYBQ6RxtEBzFEkU44/AFw0aWhLcUzftn+lMd 6mvAkjnn3WVwx3ZIaYSnqXdMat3oWUYH5gvGDLpLucgNFwxdSlnitTmO++7RXbwAQUxCkV RAK+U07xcQCPob49K+MinS1WsWtY/x+Mv7cjmz7QFOOuwMf5bL96eAhVJiTGaQ== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1696173956; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=kgTFFK0rXohb3jOb7+gGCKFSmtLBJNRKspuK0O7gCBOFJiOXSyvd8GWt9X8Kht5YoUL6rw NeLrTH8FMpTPOsL+67bogMU8+X/ivDIBL+q3kI7GFVuLj6aUcynoZMnHwBzvT8v0AuVvvA 7bE7JgWqjuvUCIEC8st+ZV4rzuvkMnePV75zcaAyhmj8VPY0GAqxjKeSnXW3ccGWL9G3+/ z3D08mXnd/OTMDz+LBrxYOEG7TRVjzQ94LWgwOxuGgWvaYcKUsEcszMDwgRecoAa5CKe9D 3YKCB8/1ufIHgw1Xi4Rv0yiDMCeAd0/Sq/raU2f16ij3ROaXB+nIiuAsGw7WJw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=MMMk6Zbr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyKK-0006wx-7p; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:25:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyKI-0006wm-Kz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:25:46 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyKI-0002bs-DA for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:25:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyKX-0003wh-Vv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:26:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65979: incorrect =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cguix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?hash=E2=80=9D?= for FastQC Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2023 15:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65979 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 65979@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 65979-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65979.169617392315104 (code B ref 65979); Sun, 01 Oct 2023 15:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 65979) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2023 15:25:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35153 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyJv-0003vW-AR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:25:23 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]:40271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qmyJt-0003vC-Cx for 65979@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:25:21 -0400 Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6bc9353be9bso2040202a34.1 for <65979@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:25:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696173898; x=1696778698; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=0emxUY2Mx81P1MPqpcjfpshWWND5A+nqa7ArOwsT3kA=; b=MMMk6ZbrTOhU5H8kWK0WPcFp0MLN1L4vo/SoFzeES1YqbyNmImlXp35c6/5FCqWM96 /qbYVlFCxqJh7s6LUhnX9Yz0tRPQ8ncQWqrIaQKUZ5j0VyX6oB1HOkgPRf7D8gz1VoEo pNQGBbbA5mEP1GrypGJxhz/vz8rf8bLJaWlQzy4dgkxSPjUxS5p7L29a4o7c/6JqYrlw Dj4T8lKt/KTv+JjY46Q4WvOW4GIw4L9Q5AwHRNyZ/KaV1zWfIOhH3YdrLQoEHZCQBrP5 EDSxczhL8cRC3/MqvmsBuP4iIji4VmrdtD7vjUY+LCsj3Fh9xKB9smC/ubeqaT9s40ro 7ARg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696173898; x=1696778698; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0emxUY2Mx81P1MPqpcjfpshWWND5A+nqa7ArOwsT3kA=; b=sNYnO/dbAKjxtppofKPOr5lNV+5T9FpfPIpFB8Z2OqEGyHFKyw7ctQs9e5POfPtCOb IdGvos2SWwukrZyhVtvuUpYVXcR+ZmHFbz6wQTXbU6etlT1y39FxQzWiwiZpWlvVnKvT vcfzriGeQuWkIqkKXdanTircfyEKWIc2UncY7USiXxrUMmI07enghzAj5jXOLprrIC+C seeruDU6k3KKAkdtH3sqXGFGEhqPx0ZTjhLx/lH4CwAr20XcqEhQfQ908hdHgtyhnaTY 5bP7ztkN0qWK2CBSMCW++7FDeaK8rZy/hw+gcF4gCGSeHc7VNWOPLCIQ0n8JAqnnOQ7f DBfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx66d7f2KXMQStnIPd970eg6k5sIHK2aS+TvXNFNElcQgzGzIOk 1W3V+RUw/gXmpkfbyIFkS7LOmwi1PUUOpfndQ4I= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHmgWNF5XqaZGjbjKs+WukRbY22f3eQE5yu3MkFADD1WlFSqDDKUqzHSX4AQKuESQY1Vb6hN6j243IdFNl9DxA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:8197:b0:1d6:4c63:7ba9 with SMTP id k23-20020a056870819700b001d64c637ba9mr11124318oae.3.1696173898541; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:24:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87v8ccd7oy.fsf@gmail.com> <87fs313x92.fsf@gmail.com> <87pm252h3c.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm1ys7oq.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87pm1ys7oq.fsf@gnu.org> From: Simon Tournier Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 17:24:47 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.63 X-Spam-Score: -4.63 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: DDDF755213 X-TUID: AXAt6o0YeufL Hi, On Sun, 1 Oct 2023 at 17:07, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > >> My take is that it=E2=80=99s OK to keep =E2=80=98vcs-file?=E2=80=99 as= is: the best we could do > >> would be to add complicated heuristics in the hope corner cases like > >> this one would be better dealt with, but it wouldn=E2=80=99t be bullet= -proof > >> anyway. > > > > Well, the question is what other VCS as 'svn-fetch', etc. are doing? > > Remove the relevant metadata directory/directories. What does it mean "relevant"? :-) Where do I have to look to implement the exact same behaviour of what do the fetch methods? > Now, SWH does not use =E2=80=98guix hash=E2=80=99 (I suppose) so they=E2= =80=99ll have to address > that on their side (in Python code I guess). Yes for sure. It does not change the fact that "guix hash" has a bug. Cheers, simon