From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 39575@debbugs.gnu.org, 28659@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28659: bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:04:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ0BrbfqmrsmfJykwqPA8PQFtSUB3JBdNaN1=npZNa36Eg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pned6zw2.fsf@gnu.org>
On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 15:40, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Exactly. But like I wrote above, I don’t think it’s a strong argument.
I agree and the big picture depends on the audience.
Scientific communities would be fine with centralized archives such as
SWH. And only centralized archives IMHO can provide a reliable "long
term" support which is the point for that communities. (Quote because
not clearly defined what it is. :-))
Other communities would prefer distributed archive such as IPFS or
GNUnet but 1. it still needs some work and 2. the "long term" is not
guarantee by nature, IMHO. But it is probably not an issue for that
communities.
> What remains is the issue with ‘content-addressed-item?’, then.
I agree.
The bridge with SWH is in good shape, IMHO.
And the pending IPFS patch would deserve more love. :-) Maybe soon...
Cheers,
simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-17 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-12 13:40 bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2020-02-12 14:55 ` zimoun
2020-02-13 21:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-14 1:05 ` zimoun
2020-02-14 10:03 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2020-02-14 10:56 ` zimoun
2020-02-14 10:47 ` zimoun
2020-02-14 12:26 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-14 13:24 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2020-02-14 13:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-15 15:32 ` zimoun
2020-02-15 20:01 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-02-15 23:57 ` Bengt Richter
2020-02-17 8:47 ` zimoun
2020-02-17 13:26 ` Efraim Flashner
2020-02-17 15:02 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-02-17 18:32 ` zimoun
2020-02-19 11:58 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2020-02-21 15:58 ` zimoun
2020-02-21 20:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-14 12:45 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2020-02-14 13:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-15 15:51 ` zimoun
2020-02-14 13:45 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2020-02-14 21:34 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-15 15:43 ` bug#28659: " zimoun
2020-02-16 10:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-17 10:18 ` zimoun
2020-02-17 14:40 ` bug#28659: " Ludovic Courtès
2020-02-17 15:04 ` zimoun [this message]
2020-09-09 14:31 ` bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash zimoun
2020-09-10 8:14 ` Ludovic Courtès
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ3okZ0BrbfqmrsmfJykwqPA8PQFtSUB3JBdNaN1=npZNa36Eg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
--cc=28659@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=39575@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).