From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: bug#23971: Nobody has a shell Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:30:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <874m7tjiyj.fsf@gnu.org> <20160714201024.GA32471@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxaU-0004nG-Er for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:31:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxaQ-0003h7-Du for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:31:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39633) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxaQ-0003h3-9v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:31:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxaQ-00027Z-0C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:31:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160714201024.GA32471@jasmine> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: 23971-done@debbugs.gnu.org Thanks efraim, I should have RTFM more on guix refresh, I guess... Leo, yes I'll try reboot to see if it makes any difference, and then remove the user if that don't do it. And report here. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 10:10 PM, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:25:57PM +0200, Vincent Legoll wrote: >> > Indeed, fixed in 2d94702ff4133606cda1e51a2c8378a8e79afb9d. >> > >> > The =E2=80=98shell=E2=80=99 field was omitted from the definition of = =E2=80=9Cnobody=E2=80=9D, which is >> > why it ended up using Bash, which is the default shell. >> >> Thanks the fix looks good, but I tried with guix system reconfigure >> after guix pull >> That does not change /etc/passwd > > I've noticed that certain changes to my own user require reboot. > > Others, which involve bringing previously non-Guix controlled user > parameters under control of Guix, seemed to require me to remove the > user from my system configuration, reconfigure, and then re-add the > user. I'm not sure what nobody's GuixSD user configuration would look > like. > > Neither is a good solution, but could you try them out? --=20 Vincent Legoll