&gt; This collision is expected.  The &#39;ld&#39; within ld-wrapper, generated from<br>&gt; the template in gnu/packages/<a href="http://ld-wrapper.in">ld-wrapper.in</a>, automatically adds -rpath<br>&gt; arguments to the linker for each shared library, so that the runtime<br>&gt; linker will be able to find them in their non-standard locations.<div><br></div><div>If one of those &#39;ld&#39; files is the real ld, and the other is supposed to be a wrapper around the real one that adds functionality, then how is it that things will always work out OK if only one of them is installed? I&#39;m not sure how the &quot;arbitrary&quot; selection works, but doesn&#39;t the choice matter?</div>