From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id EMThJtv95GWLeAEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 23:46:51 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id EMThJtv95GWLeAEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 23:46:51 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=blJQLZUl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1709506011; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=zkFlyCchrwecoKPR2kxMSmOUUwQsVWEuFF54V27v4zw=; b=A6RkO5YQe/NPhaP7N3VMIUYskYfXkna0wJeCIp2Ge7LHaW8fy98ka56CV5a0KvOCVPTaL5 8Pd6KlJ7Sh134e27ldyJ+VL13Vvd3/71NeCD0Pyl/MyvN697/j/PmsxafdH+ugcBG/Ky0L U9MOs6B+OZ2E2FV22J02OnoLeJBvMXaeeQrEYSybU6uctznashkuhQkoyfdI6Hon02uZuG ZeK1/l++JnmnpWmpwdVmWZUc+B7loPrPPJK1aHepgnARd+2v7m26RTZAoO+lcXBI6zDUUe VzbDZ2+Qr28ZJgT7dNO3pZHeqpZsQRz9OAsnlaXOsqcmvrccXglLxb1CNLTvCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=blJQLZUl; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1709506011; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=qouhAdhw5iRYTsdmsK/axKef1O3VUWjpQIgsNxLXtD5mnEUrZMX467Vp2oehEA1i8WFmW5 DqrkDxJeGo10b2xbGNhh51d2GYLC23UcEMm10rLQTJUdoQ/6XmnGTsosUc3oYkY2VNgcgd Cx/TevvPCh4gPfjy64b1s16JQmLvAC/lHmySf4SpRDIv+nMcAywHT6qlP3oxXNMxiLPZJa 0BjL+QBJVw03mUmh3rUFmfp5UDpkXDyjI/UKm51PEIJTkEkNH4hSFPnQb+Mmw0PXhzbtzQ df7dXrXryvfdwBI28fVzWJbIoHvO6dOqMhbDgElhCqHG+ErAe7fdQw9riF5/jQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BCA05E9CE for ; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 23:46:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgubM-0008VJ-I7; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgubK-0008Un-56 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:34 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rgubJ-00087W-TR for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgubm-0001YB-IM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#69515: grub-efi-bootloader doesn't make multiple boot entries with efibootmgr if multiple targets are specified Resent-From: Nathan Dehnel Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 22:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69515 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Oleg Pykhalov Cc: 69515@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 69515-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69515.17095060185948 (code B ref 69515); Sun, 03 Mar 2024 22:47:02 +0000 Received: (at 69515) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Mar 2024 22:46:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41403 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgubi-0001Xs-3Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:58 -0500 Received: from mail-oa1-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:45493) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rgubg-0001Xf-9V for 69515@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 17:46:56 -0500 Received: by mail-oa1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-21fa97a9c53so1735995fac.3 for <69515@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 14:46:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709505921; x=1710110721; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zkFlyCchrwecoKPR2kxMSmOUUwQsVWEuFF54V27v4zw=; b=blJQLZUlTMLFDN2nPj9wmkK3zxxswfWgikvOfyX7p9hF62bVxWh+h6W/2homejYyO/ sGx40F2KbTXBiGYElRCnt7ZWzpIAKgBffokl8SVYCIQ2xn+jtQDikUBg3fAvIwSg7vBu rarK7LSVGNMN+E7RDnHwzxXJb8nJukGKrDH2wg4LStMSLYHUZ1b3dj8gYu1Gw9rRjmcj srJNA5IRTiBuRs+R1QZPIV1nQBq8jzweiXA9d1Rmc7FnI7zaKDl7SGUvNEHRkIl+c8Vv u5/JSMgnZ9zr/0LU9fdrZ+Rss4uoVw2YyBNEg535Lo/zAcWFEsTYxKVACX30nyQoRF67 mNxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709505921; x=1710110721; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zkFlyCchrwecoKPR2kxMSmOUUwQsVWEuFF54V27v4zw=; b=AWaHRpy6LLaVF9qkuuMapNFKjbzKgtIRcBpOo39qoIVhqQhRzi1zeH5/3m80g7fNB0 DsWJjmFJ4btnbxrcxd3hNcKYmXbt0RydhzNo64R0zh0RT6inVrhD5cK5AGG3EqcrsJ5K p3Sr/N9aqKnWV463VZ9/G6r5rWHJ6Pb/vJ9VwMMTvYnUBrehS7zuPFKLIRtDJbPvd3Dc ssG5IDTiC9lIbOL8y0nnJRJ7hgh+IBmAnxfzspnm/0IeDzAnNVjM1xnTCrlbt6A6fS/7 u7YbghVdrQlw3NLhDgjoTMUjYw3EC7DPVWI7QLFAIB/x/26/a7q/KgZEYf/Yerw65a02 x3lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyqqOWmpmGU8cJQtbBoIX5a2GQRZQmCpy69KVk3cQPwa9tsnZ5y 3NOf28+JMD6gIo9pg/udSTmGRvb1DghIR3CCeP+DbBbS04dog9XMbziS6ZbZY9qZKCkytByCLMN 5jph4Uy9lbUmFVpt/GWXA/olSNtg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF22S1wTBbumSM7GL6FBHJhhCa2vy+WvCKdxQGnNHn13O+/8eX9MQFLLZ8uXBals8kRDggAZFPtCaR2h3L8Eac= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:461b:b0:220:f8fc:bc77 with SMTP id z27-20020a056870461b00b00220f8fcbc77mr3416956oao.55.1709505921051; Sun, 03 Mar 2024 14:45:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87jzmjojox.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87jzmjojox.fsf@gmail.com> From: Nathan Dehnel Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2024 16:45:10 -0600 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.13 X-Spam-Score: -5.13 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2BCA05E9CE X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: pyr0wRcK4Ba3 The configure makes only one boot entry, and if I remove one of the disks, it disappears from the BIOS boot options. If I make another boot entry manually with efibootmgr, it appears as a second boot option. On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 1:31=E2=80=AFAM Oleg Pykhalov = wrote: > > Hi, > > Nathan Dehnel writes: > > > (bootloader > > (bootloader-configuration > > (bootloader grub-efi-bootloader) > > (targets '("/boot/efi1" "/boot/efi2")) > > > > This creates multiple boot partitions, but doesn't register all of > > them with the BIOS/create multiple boot entries > > It appears that the reason for the issue is that the EFI file is > identical on both targets. Could this behavior actually be considered a > bug? Consider the scenario of a multi-disk system; have you attempted to > remove one of the disks and observe the boot process to determine if the > duplicated EFI file is causing unexpected behavior? > > Regards, > Oleg.