From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Subject: bug#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 20:35:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fu78e1lh.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c042a96dd7c050562c199f4" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eao4b-00053n-Gq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:36:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eao4Y-00057t-ED for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:36:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eao4Y-00057i-9u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:36:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eao4Y-0005ac-0P for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 14:36:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87fu78e1lh.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 30097@debbugs.gnu.org --94eb2c042a96dd7c050562c199f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke : > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > > > nspr 4.17 is not reproducible. > > Diffoscope output attached. > > Thanks for the report! > > The attached patch should solve it. Since there are quite a few > dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'staging' branch that > will be started shortly after the core-updates merge. WDYT? > > Yes, it should go to a branch. I also don't know if this fixes the difference also, where an additional ; is present... Could you check this, or should I run a test with the patch? It seems like a 2 byte difference. --94eb2c042a96dd7c050562c199f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>:=
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com&g= t; writes:

> nspr 4.17 is not reproducible.
> Diffoscope output attached.

Thanks for the report!

The attached patch should solve it.=C2=A0 Since there are quite a few
dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'staging' br= anch that
will be started shortly after the core-updates merge.=C2=A0 WDYT?

Yes, it should go to a branch.

I also don't know if this f= ixes the difference also, where an additional ; is present...
Could you check this, or should I run a test with the pa= tch?
It seems like a 2 byte difference.=C2= =A0

--94eb2c042a96dd7c050562c199f4--