From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Subject: bug#30097: [core-updates] nspr 4.17 not reproducible Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 21:24:17 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fu78e1lh.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a7xgdxs9.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c1468a2dacd10562c24837" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaoq3-0005Vr-Q0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:25:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaopy-0004g5-Sn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:25:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaopy-0004fu-LC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:25:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eaopy-0006m2-Ez for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 15:25:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87a7xgdxs9.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke Cc: 30097@debbugs.gnu.org --001a11c1468a2dacd10562c24837 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-01-14 20:51 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke : > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > > > 2018-01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke : > > > >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > >> > >> > nspr 4.17 is not reproducible. > >> > Diffoscope output attached. > >> > >> Thanks for the report! > >> > >> The attached patch should solve it. Since there are quite a few > >> dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'staging' branch th= at > >> will be started shortly after the core-updates merge. WDYT? > >> > >> Yes, it should go to a branch. > > > > I also don't know if this fixes the difference also, where an additiona= l > ; > > is present... > > Could you check this, or should I run a test with the patch? > > It seems like a 2 byte difference. > > It passes `guix build --rounds=3D2`, so I'm not sure what was up with tha= t > ";". > Most probably it is some kind of checksum which includes the timestamp. If it passes "guix build --rounds=3D2" it should be fine. Thanks for the clarification. --001a11c1468a2dacd10562c24837 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -01-14 20:51 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>:=
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> writes:

> 2018-01-14 19:28 GMT+01:00 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>:
>
>> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <bo= skovits@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> > nspr 4.17 is not reproducible.
>> > Diffoscope output attached.
>>
>> Thanks for the report!
>>
>> The attached patch should solve it.=C2=A0 Since there are quite a = few
>> dependent packages, I'd like to push this to a new 'stagin= g' branch that
>> will be started shortly after the core-updates merge.=C2=A0 WDYT?<= br> >>
>> Yes, it should go to a branch.
>
> I also don't know if this fixes the difference also, where an addi= tional ;
> is present...
> Could you check this, or should I run a test with the patch?
> It seems like a 2 byte difference.

It passes `guix build --rounds=3D2`, so I'm not sure what w= as up with that ";".

Most probably it is= some kind of checksum which includes the timestamp.
If it passes "= ;guix build --rounds=3D2" it should be fine.
Thanks for the = clarification.

--001a11c1468a2dacd10562c24837--