From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nikita Karetnikov <nikita.karetnikov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: List of abbreviations for licenses
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2012 01:34:08 +0300
Message-ID: <CAD15K4shLrDAjngKyuVt354UtcaKwMzQfdH5-4M3aWQqAtK5Pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD15K4uRCcLfyq9Cbhp8SzvP09iWOK21T8F_H-PfgRTMTjriTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87vcco2hgr.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKr=PyO1M2hFS-T9xhLadYOX=ZO+CHyqCs4SAKGCwBK2-FZvfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87hao7zzgr.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAD15K4t9R9piZeZX7JTXKdBB6_F06m_RPDBVcGwASqkQW0TMFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k3stprjs.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita.karetnikov@gmail.com>) id 1Th6Ul-0005IV-VF
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:34:12 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita.karetnikov@gmail.com>) id 1Th6Uj-0002lo-Rz
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:34:11 -0500
Received: from mail-vb0-f41.google.com ([209.85.212.41]:60718)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <nikita.karetnikov@gmail.com>) id 1Th6Uj-0002lb-Nm
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 17:34:09 -0500
Received: by mail-vb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l22so1039582vbn.0
	for <bug-guix@gnu.org>; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:34:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87k3stprjs.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: bug-guix@gnu.org

> Can you make this a single #:export?

Which one should I use? (The latter looks better, IMHO.)

  #:export (license? license-name asl2.0 boost1.0 bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
            cddl1.0 cpl1.0 epl1.0 gpl2 gpl2+ gpl3 gpl3+ ijg ibmpl1.0 lgpl2.=
1
            lgpl2.1+ lgpl3 lgpl3+ mpl2.0 openssl public-domain x11 zlib)

  #:export (license? license-name
            asl2.0
            boost1.0
            bsd-2 bsd-3 bsd-4
            cddl1.0
            cpl1.0
            epl1.0
            gpl2 gpl2+ gpl3 gpl3+
            ijg
            ibmpl1.0 lgpl2.1 lgpl2.1+ lgpl3 lgpl3+
            mpl2.0
            openssl
            public-domain
            x11
            zlib)

> While we=92re at it, we should add a =91url=92 field to <license>, so tha=
t the
> URL above would be a field of the license object instead of being a
> comment.

I think that we should use 'uri' instead. [1]

[1] https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c3/URI_Euler_Diagram_n=
o_lone_URIs.svg