From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qGVcNuNPgF/PCQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:56:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id MIQKMuNPgF+WFAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:56:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D65A94060E for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 11:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48178 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQr0R-0007EI-OF for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:56:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQr0F-0007CV-HJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:56:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:51017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQr0E-0004r4-FF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:56:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQr0E-0001vt-Ec for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:56:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#43779: tbb: test_global_control failure Resent-From: Greg Hogan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43779 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 43779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43779.16022445337391 (code B ref 43779); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 11:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 43779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Oct 2020 11:55:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQqzk-0001v8-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:55:33 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:44957) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQqzi-0001uu-KC for 43779@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 07:55:31 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id t9so9971638wrq.11 for <43779@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 04:55:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mR+Ozi4I462yyGklfCShreE5Ro7wxx4iDG4db6+RK5A=; b=KykIvMB2MqLyy1w5E1EeJV0Sq/Zq2MeW1AMFtwEHoAvwirQMA7dnc1BKkTEeJvTGDk rPmd5QlJtf04CfoWiAnuMrkwUUCUxOWMo8RzUb+xtQ0DGSUeUAW5uQ8P5OTv1L/OoIe0 gfLJzt8mNgCKQ3fuOZ9dXRE2mOjLk54tg4YG6LUgAxEjj5/PkSR+zQrz3SAlSU7VxEr6 xxSJ6K0aLVZqj7+vJSPryUy0ncVOZQP77TgzwA+XflWNWMKCxzOBkkeQR4Hty7HcGuFX hFo4WSB/JOvZt4ZlahigB6qrr/Vpse2hgyA7MjkZ7MuIOn1AOc8h+jyYW76wKZiiEwt1 AcbA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mR+Ozi4I462yyGklfCShreE5Ro7wxx4iDG4db6+RK5A=; b=mL3K1xlXTtlFC3GaAY55dXNMiWOPppZvDKxFvGPYQ5/gHXDcE9+RNBQdmwpm+sGPoc Wy15mqthfLwSkdpfjbtQgggocgmJ4k0x0/sCNiUfr17NOT4VcceHmxhFWkI1dFe5Y2zC Yp9cdVpfSD0jk2EMXJDkltSC5hK65wHbEx+18mTFX4smeH1eGmR46PzjkYzh/XO13Gwf +5khj+qRYyTiE3xXfJo4IT6msEjYNoAc2h5+12DaSot4tztJvvpC6CC5a+/+qNeRGEyW GVY+5xabmQ8ghKVT7xXdIIvWsGB0wsYhwB/dDT5TbiYwcuSiWJKiaEmHfOUnBEPckROh DjiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qDgblRXIRKGBQeRKTLnqtP9bM92TGxkGsICy8MAMfDyp8iwKR b33ttiT0nYT8vNEz4DETcuMlTS9BRE5TrvsUE91o1g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvnFLFXay9JGLWUicqUCYu0qO1MPD/W5YlMK9y6CUiIYN8a+KB91tOdY+KuqdRq6pRd+gu8SAHQsmrmk7ktQQ= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5449:: with SMTP id w9mr15401670wrv.182.1602244524649; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 04:55:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <366cee92f612159fe9ab9d141ff31b6bb96f7f92.camel@qlfiles.net> <87pn5wwyqk.fsf@gnu.org> <0B0D193F-886F-40AB-B181-07431015E539@greghogan.com> <875z7lvi40.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <875z7lvi40.fsf@gnu.org> From: Greg Hogan Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 07:55:13 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bc459505b13b9fa8" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: christopher@librehacker.com, 43779@debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Howard Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=greghogan-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=KykIvMB2; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.49 X-TUID: TIxd6OstiCbH --000000000000bc459505b13b9fa8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am also successfully building tbb-2020.3 and octave-5.2.0 locally. Is it possible to retry the build on ci.guix.gnu.org? I'm still puzzled why the 64-bit builds of tbb-2020.3 are missing from ci.guix.gnu.org. And previous versions of tbb have had mixed success building. https://data.guix.gnu.org/repository/1/branch/master/package/tbb/output-his= tory But the logs for the old failed builds are missing. https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/jj0ym95spwggf519jmgkfzjy5vk28g3h-tbb-2020.1 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/nfxwyk82y38irsf75pshaklmfm6vnhsq-tbb-2020.0 On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 5:31 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi, > > Greg Hogan skribis: > > > I don=E2=80=99t see any build failures on ci.guix.gnu.org < > http://ci.guix.gnu.org/>, only two successes. Where is x86_64, should it > not at least show as pending? > > > > Builds matching tbb-2020.3 > > ID Specification Completion time Job Name System Log > > 3253827 guix-master 2 Oct 10:51 +0200 > tbb-2020.3.armhf-linux tbb-2020.3 armhf-linux > > 3253435 guix-master 2 Oct 02:17 +0200 > tbb-2020.3.i686-linux tbb-2020.3 i686-linux > > Here=E2=80=99s the build log of a failure on x86_64: > > https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/qc926v75q54k94mwgz6gn4s02sjgrr03-tbb-2020.3 > > (You can build such URLs by appending the basename of the store file > name to =E2=80=9Chttps://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/=E2=80=9D.) > > It ends like this: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ./test_reader_writer_lock.exe > done > ./test_tbb_condition_variable.exe > done > ./test_intrusive_list.exe > done > ./test_concurrent_priority_queue.exe > done > ./test_task_priority.exe > Known issue: priority effect is limited in case of blocking-style nesting > make[1]: *** [../../build/Makefile.test:274: test_tbb_plain] Segmentation > fault > make[1]: Leaving directory > '/tmp/guix-build-tbb-2020.3.drv-0/tbb-2020.3-checkout/build/guix_release' > make: *** [Makefile:42: test] Error 2 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Ludo=E2=80=99. > --000000000000bc459505b13b9fa8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am also successfully building tbb-2020.3 and=C2=A0octave-5.2.0 = locally. Is it possible to retry the build on ci.guix.gnu.org?

I'm sti= ll puzzled why the 64-bit builds of tbb-2020.3 are missing from ci.guix.gnu.org.

And p= revious versions of tbb have had mixed success building.
But the logs for the old fai= led builds are missing.
=C2=A0 https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/nfxwyk82y38irsf75= pshaklmfm6vnhsq-tbb-2020.0

On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 = at 5:31 PM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gn= u.org> wrote:
Hi,

Greg Hogan <code= @greghogan.com> skribis:

> I don=E2=80=99t see any build failures on ci.guix.gnu.org <http://ci= .guix.gnu.org/>, only two successes. Where is x86_64, should it not = at least show as pending?
>
> Builds matching tbb-2020.3
> ID=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Specification=C2=A0 =C2=A0Completion time Job=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0Name=C2=A0 =C2=A0 System=C2=A0 Log
> 3253827=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0guix-master=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02 Oct= 10:51 +0200=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0tbb-2020.3.armhf-linux=C2=A0 tbb-202= 0.3=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 armhf-linux
> 3253435=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0guix-master=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A02 Oct= 02:17 +0200=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0tbb-2020.3.i686-linux=C2=A0 =C2=A0tb= b-2020.3=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 i686-linux

Here=E2=80=99s the build log of a failure on x86_64:

=C2=A0 https://ci.guix.gnu.or= g/log/qc926v75q54k94mwgz6gn4s02sjgrr03-tbb-2020.3

(You can build such URLs by appending the basename of the store file
name to =E2=80=9Chttps://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/=E2=80=9D.)

It ends like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
./test_reader_writer_lock.exe=C2=A0
done
./test_tbb_condition_variable.exe=C2=A0
done
./test_intrusive_list.exe=C2=A0
done
./test_concurrent_priority_queue.exe=C2=A0
done
./test_task_priority.exe=C2=A0
Known issue: priority effect is limited in case of blocking-style nesting make[1]: *** [../../build/Makefile.test:274: test_tbb_plain] Segmentation f= ault
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/guix-build-tbb-2020.3.drv-0/tbb-2020.3= -checkout/build/guix_release'
make: *** [Makefile:42: test] Error 2
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Ludo=E2=80=99.
--000000000000bc459505b13b9fa8--