From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id dUOoKrghd2AFywAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:09:12 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id ECN8I7ghd2CZYwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:09:12 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AED21530E for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:09:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:49044 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWj0p-0006Fi-2d for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:09:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38922) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgMB-00046G-1U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:19:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52116) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgMA-0007CI-UL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:19:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgMA-0001Lh-Qv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:19:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47537: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug #47537) Resent-From: fsdfsdfsd3 Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47537 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug To: "47537@debbugs.gnu.org" <47537@debbugs.gnu.org> Received: via spool by 47537-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B47537.16184099245113 (code B ref 47537); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 14:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 47537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Apr 2021 14:18:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35420 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWgLr-0001KN-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:18:44 -0400 Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.136]:51242) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lWWnZ-0007Y6-Ui for 47537@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:06:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 04:06:29 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail; t=1618373195; bh=HwOh+WrMdkA8p8QoGbTcMukjhAPPdotmyoEUK8u9x34=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=M8Yd2pG+S8oxrvHf0kY4MDR0psbk/uQD7q4SxNERCJv5OoUeE9UKCEWCbYbHLi91M KRSwfi+eQiao5vAwiiZ4B9MZAsCWseaX2MV485UZhLZ1u9/HyEobqRwLaInTF2yHdm Pdm+Z9kh5Q8S4bVO/EGYJlN6pPS788aXAIF4Rwrg= Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <878s6140my.fsf@gnu.org> <2D4cPuIPCu0T9VFO7m3XPX4PEvS5BvunxLytmBfJcec6KNPURmLC50fe6PS4ObwSgS7XKOHnR0K17HFKZZlIcLNVQxaoS9O-ffDt1uLbXcY=@protonmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:18:42 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:07:44 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: fsdfsdfsd3 X-ACL-Warn: , fsdfsdfsd3 From: fsdfsdfsd3 via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1618420152; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=HwOh+WrMdkA8p8QoGbTcMukjhAPPdotmyoEUK8u9x34=; b=CkkoQgJ/ie7Gy6s7GFw/t/Q2Zg75SypgBIWBBuEtoobL0adtOzPczU/vepSjVgypDGWiPR 2nCwmQ+a7cW1g1S3i//EmmgjKCjSRIvGtELIdE0qrxAy1+9B0NsuRt5yGIVV+CmEE08RLG 3wV/G7zeCFAXAywIYEGvf/0cdFwsHczHHekK718Vb/ZSt38omu3kkQgjcEQXZ3fKSysmSg ZeCnYFjdemZ+fJrK3+zSzUXnFCoXdcEzrH1kcEer/aQqMPn6+2AFNdWiAcxjfebeDRCNmr 9skQKrxqz+9qqhBRd1JfGRlasNfGFe5y78tS3AKr+GqNnz1lXY7d86mNwSaawA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1618420152; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=EEW20mB2YPlnQYw8PQRr0mlTvq3uloq36UB7X3f4AC2kvoDt0RLKqfeX62qb+n8FHPEkjn EZWH6DittHQUYvqC1ERxWifl9I1fqQkHpMzTvX3OhBv2T5ClVaULAdRUd3t0RB75NQUqNX d0LV+h156EgDdnF1SAN9QJjC3fn0pITeLSJs6uaCxqnqRj2L76cYoK/I1FYv6eZza3uQsO EpobZhJCD0CMAsDVazwbeqCVUMQ0UlSJ5F+T++XwZOyeA/FhK1AFpS9pdHJNekKf35Uief QCBH61DtZPmjRVEXG6DVSD2HJKBqmzbNLBgKX4rmig8v6yaFA+l7Dx+edBYYUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=M8Yd2pG+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.55 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=protonmail.com header.s=protonmail header.b=M8Yd2pG+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1AED21530E X-Spam-Score: -3.55 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: DQ0tIAqZD6gC Hello, I ended up testing my config file with nfs4 and that part did work fine. I = had earlier errors unrelated to this that threw me off thinking that would = not work. To clarify then, the issue here only seems to be with the mount function in= the (guix build syscalls) module. This results in a "NO route to host" err= or even though mount.nfs works fine on the command line. However perhaps I am assuming that mount.nfs does not make use of nfs4 behi= nd the scenes, even without nfs-utils installed, when it does. Thank you! =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Friday, April 2, 2021 1:17 AM, wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report > #47537: specification->package does not seem to support outputs, > which was filed against the guix package. > > Thank you for your report, which has now been closed. > You can view the full report at > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D47537 > > If you require further information, please followup to 47537@debbugs.gnu.= org. > > debbugs.gnu.org maintainers > (administrator, GNU bugs database)