From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raghav Gururajan Subject: bug#39648: Reverse my commits on GNOME meta-package Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:09:05 -0500 Message-ID: <9f88fe4148c57c48b87206387daf8a7b9af84544.camel@disroot.org> References: <6bad163b0ed969c5c1117f9fa7446631060a8d4d.camel@disroot.org> <875zg56nq4.fsf@nckx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wuWfO5w2Xz+Jig/maTWk" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j3lmN-00012t-WD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:10:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j3lmN-0006qB-1r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:10:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j3lmM-0006pw-MJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:10:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j3lmM-000291-Gb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:10:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <875zg56nq4.fsf@nckx> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , 39648@debbugs.gnu.org --=-wuWfO5w2Xz+Jig/maTWk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Copy-pasted from #guix: >=20 > Whoa there, that's drastic, let's put that on hold. >=20 > The first two only add packages (did they break anything? what?),=20 > the third has no effect on packages if your commit message is=20 > accurate. >=20 > The fourth is the only one that removes packages, and even that=20 > might be better tweaked (this time: with comments noting what each=20 > non-core package brings to the GNOME table) than flat-out=20 > reverted. >=20 > What do you think? I made a mistake of not reading comments of previous commits that were done to gnome meta-package. Since we got lot of feedbacks regarding gnome experience, I will re-conyemplate my plans for gnome, make the changes, test it throughly and then re-commit later. Also, this reverse should be smooth and does not break anything. It just takes the GNOME meta-package back to the time before I started making my commits to it. Regards, RG. --=-wuWfO5w2Xz+Jig/maTWk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEamFiplxUWgy2NgJiorDiYAVcMdsFAl5K5NEACgkQorDiYAVc Mdt0jwf/WtP/c8dfWDnZwlq4zxf6pOvHl+0vu3wTyUt8KCYIcx/NYXevT9j1ZlI8 WWPOnzq9A4vwFi2zZRiH+9MbLc08F9822kY2kShNuPU6dvTxyQ/OSHlJcJ1MwJ15 2shDXP3vu9vp20MFH4oPBiUTNZbDKOgCwrRhL50VAz0M0vLDwfil7aT4h5MM4Ju4 zgdp2AIc2VBr3AbE6gUdMHiBlHdydxf2jWZ3I5jKy+c27/8ljh1sbnet+8wMUpuI c4QJjoKOPaiev/SwS7wC48GzDfPdzJ382I6EdzhgMylUeL8gebepUw6ZzkqO4+8S q4nqi8K/9WajVOp9x9Ioi1PJ0JAfSg== =HAAI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wuWfO5w2Xz+Jig/maTWk--