From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4JBaEZxcGGBtZgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:55:08 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id aOkoDZxcGGD3BAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:55:08 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41F6940430 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45074 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6fHt-0006sK-9j for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:55:05 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6f2M-0004Or-KS for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:39:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6f2L-000630-Si for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:39:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6f2L-0000y1-RL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:39:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46242: Guix System is not listed in GNOME BOxes Resent-From: Julien Lepiller Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46242 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos ,46242@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 46242-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46242.16122083073658 (code B ref 46242); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 19:39:01 +0000 Received: (at 46242) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 19:38:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6f1n-0000wv-AS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:38:27 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu ([89.234.186.109]:56280) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6f1l-0000wm-D8 for 46242@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:38:26 -0500 Received: from lepiller.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id bd77f005; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:38:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=lepiller.eu; h=date :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:subject:to:from:message-id; s=dkim; bh=2lEhjuqJdH8svXFFyjcqIpbeQQdo7ylboI/hN6eJBWI=; b=LXQYwHI63Bho HvcIh4eON2UpcrHMTRpcruhnTkfvMQrlXj1FMwgONLPvfQPHyWYS681ZKxn5cqPX obyLvbpVWv480YakeQ4L9TlzLQYF9ycbwziGg7j4zWqyWvLdtpg9K7PMSvX70TRB DluK/goZwU13vPmbCUcUgSIYC4UyV1f5ydcvsuVPwjEz8Lv4HxF2hqZ6YSMSReEX 2PGqJe+UL8c+QDk1zzeKj7fXxehf9x+CAN186fK85nsQdIpu1Xtae12Xlf9S86lF FRtk5q9XRUF2VJ+gAH+AkptDm0bfHATa7Ch4nWCLIloRqNhSFL3/nIvy5dwPvN8l K84wp+eyMw== Received: by lepiller.eu (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c61bd024 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 1 Feb 2021 19:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:38:08 -0500 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <384048df89d10ff38c0638772c0c2a8b7cd4a1c1.camel@telenet.be> References: <384048df89d10ff38c0638772c0c2a8b7cd4a1c1.camel@telenet.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----NBAYCYXF628Q4LSURIYTVBFEOEKXMK" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Julien Lepiller Message-ID: <9DE54CA8-DC7D-4D49-A04C-425745C29381@lepiller.eu> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.26 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=lepiller.eu header.s=dkim header.b=LXQYwHI6; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=lepiller.eu (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A41F6940430 X-Spam-Score: -1.26 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: jm3Gdy6dLXip ------NBAYCYXF628Q4LSURIYTVBFEOEKXMK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think gnome boxes uses libosinfo for proposing OSs=2E There is already so= me data about Guix at https://gitlab=2Ecom/libosinfo/osinfo-db/-/tree/maste= r/data/os/guix=2Egnu=2Eorg However, we only propose an xzipped iso (and not a raw iso file), so the d= ata does not provide information on downloading=2E Either we have an outdat= ed osinfo-db, or the lack of download option prevents boxes from showing it= as a choice=2E Le 1 f=C3=A9vrier 2021 13:36:53 GMT-05:00, Maxime Devos a =C3=A9crit : >Hi guix! > >Guix System is not listed in =E2=80=98Create a Virtual Machine=E2=80=99 i= n GNOME Boxes, >which is rather absurd when GNOME Boxes has been installed via Guix >and when using Guix System=2E > >=E2=80=98Someone=E2=80=99 should fix this (preferably upstream, such that= more people >will know about Guix), this =E2=80=98someone=E2=80=99 not being me, as my= personal >TODO list is long enough as is=2E > >Greetings, >Maxime=2E ------NBAYCYXF628Q4LSURIYTVBFEOEKXMK Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think gnome boxes uses libosinfo for proposing O= Ss=2E There is already some data about Guix at https://git= lab=2Ecom/libosinfo/osinfo-db/-/tree/master/data/os/guix=2Egnu=2Eorg
However, we only propose an xzipped iso (and not a raw iso file), so t= he data does not provide information on downloading=2E Either we have an ou= tdated osinfo-db, or the lack of download option prevents boxes from showin= g it as a choice=2E

Le 1 f=C3=A9vrier 202= 1 13:36:53 GMT-05:00, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet=2Ebe> a =C3= =A9crit :
Hi guix!

Guix System is not listed in =E2=80=
=98Create a Virtual Machine=E2=80=99 in GNOME Boxes,
which is rather abs=
urd when GNOME Boxes has been installed via Guix
and when using Guix Sys=
tem=2E

=E2=80=98Someone=E2=80=99 should fix this (preferably upstrea=
m, such that more people
will know about Guix), this =E2=80=98someone=E2=
=80=99 not being me, as my personal
TODO list is long enough as is=2E
Greetings,
Maxime=2E
------NBAYCYXF628Q4LSURIYTVBFEOEKXMK--