From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mLpOJyPq2l7SJQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 00:58:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id yNkhIyPq2l5cNgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 00:58:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F8E940308 for ; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 00:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58180 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhNA1-0006AH-3e for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:58:09 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhN9u-0006A8-HY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:58:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jhN9u-0006DI-8h for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhN9u-0003rm-7U for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:58:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41715: The program '/gnu/store/foobar/compute-guix-derivation' failed to compute the derivation for guix Resent-From: o.rojon@posteo.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 00:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41715 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Received: via spool by 41715-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41715.159140505914830 (code B ref 41715); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 00:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 41715) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2020 00:57:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50398 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhN9Q-0003r1-MI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:57:39 -0400 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:35287) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jhN9P-0003qn-22 for 41715@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:57:31 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D34FF2400FC for <41715@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1591405044; bh=oDva69Btb/lcVxIvjC3OUCDUOMF9u92ny69ftvIaPPs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:From; b=fcN4j5TRgVjdPa5Tw9MonuNPow/bSQGAXDbsENyqXBupzQ72MtdnDu2M1CFcQwKhK KefAF9JawlNOi7QhU+CN4jfJ5brP+JFjctxIEXP+l4Y4gdow1r9iRjGxywi7Szlf5J YLcDK1XxbzDc2Pm8p+JWd0zEHfJ2Ek54zwnYwmJ6AWCU5/R0BvKe1ot8F/abxosPKf 6GJ4Il6b3JekqXLef0+xoO27Ba7ow37nNIDjgfP7eO1g3dgDnazekbjXOYxiDc2CGP E3/gBDGlM+x4aK4u/3/DJkEiWRpWUPTj7m6kqv/VxERNkZ/mKl9fdUGZC8SxpQYjn/ sW9+h9A5DA7aQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49f1M820tcz9rxK; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:57:24 +0200 From: o.rojon@posteo.net In-Reply-To: <87mu5h1noe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <54320f33124f0122ed56fb7e15b17ae4@posteo.net> <87sgfa7g9r.fsf@gnu.org> <6a6c6f638f0a33ec39b9e70843090299@posteo.net> <87mu5h1noe.fsf@gnu.org> Message-ID: <97da9eb75628d48de3b8ef4abb212bca@posteo.net> X-Sender: o.rojon@posteo.net User-Agent: Posteo Webmail X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41715@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=fcN4j5TR; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.10 X-TUID: heOQYrWVuivB Hi Ludo, guix pull --roll-back did not solve the issue. The only thing I believe=20 to have changed is the "host version" portion of the error message. 'which guix' actually points to ~/.configu/guix/current/bin/guix. Should=20 this command yield a different value? I have actually not done anything regarding either guix-daemon or=20 offloading. The only things I did after the fresh install were a=20 reconfigure and passing a manifest file to 'guix package -m'. I may have misunderstood what Jakub wrote because I am unsure what a=20 transient failure is. The portion I believe to have understood=20 essentially says "try again later and it should work". I found the logs of 'compute-guix-derivation', but I was unable to see=20 anything meaningful opening the .drv.bz2 file in emacs. Am I doing=20 something wrong? I wont be on my guix machine for some days now but appreciate pointers.=20 :) Olivier On 05.06.2020 18:29, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Hi, >=20 > o.rojon@posteo.net skribis: >=20 >> Just to follow up: a roll-back does NOT solve the issue. >>=20 >> What I have tried: >> 1) roll-back via guix system roll-back (to the generation that was >> created upon system installation) >> 2) roll-back via guix package --roll-back (same) >> 3) (1) + (2) combined >> 4) boot into the generation created upon system installation. >>=20 >> In none of these cases was I able to run 'guix pull'. >=20 > Thanks for testing this. >=20 > Note that, if =E2=80=9Cwhich guix=E2=80=9D returns ~/.config/guix/current= /bin/guix,=20 > then > none of the rollbacks above can have any effect. What could make a > difference (but again, that would seem weird to me) is: >=20 > guix pull --roll-back >=20 > Are you passing extra options to guix-daemon, such as > =E2=80=98--cache-failures=E2=80=99? Or did you enable offloading? >=20 > It could also be that a transient failure is causing a silent build > failure somewhere, as Jakub suggests. >=20 > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. >=20 > PS: Please keep the bug address Cc=E2=80=99d.