From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Castillo Subject: bug#30476: failing test-suite Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:58:39 +0100 Message-ID: <9613f64e-f753-0de3-aea1-e4be0400a459@uni-bremen.de> References: <873721s27b.fsf@gnu.org> <40111d94-43df-1c0d-3cdb-36b8cf99b0cc@uni-bremen.de> <878tbtozrv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emgXZ-0005ay-Ut for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:59:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emgXW-0007U7-TN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:59:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37912) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emgXW-0007TT-P7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:59:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emgXW-0003eE-FW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 08:59:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878tbtozrv.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 30476@debbugs.gnu.org On 16.02.2018 14:00, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Martin Castillo skribis: > >> ++ guix build superseded -d >> accepted connection from pid 22991, user pi >> random seed for tests: 1518709083 >> guix build: package 'superseded' has been superseded by 'bar' >> ++ guix build bar -d >> accepted connection from pid 23282, user pi >> random seed for tests: 1518709358 >> + test /home/pi/code/guix/test-tmp/store/y6l76g4i1m2q0ckliw4941x4sa0wa24w-bar-9001.drv = '' >> + rm -rf t-guix-build-10577 >> FAIL tests/guix-build.sh (exit status: 1) > > This one looks fishy, I don’t see how it could happen (see > tests/guix-build.sh). Is it reproducible? > > You can run “make check TESTS=tests/guix-build.sh” to run just this > test. > No, it is not reproducible. >> In guix/scripts/package.scm: >> 250:34 5 (_ # �) >> In srfi/srfi-1.scm: >> 466:18 4 (fold # �) >> In guix/ui.scm: >> 1161:13 3 (_ _ 0) >> 1040:23 2 (texi->plain-text _) >> In texinfo.scm: >> 1131:22 1 (parse _) >> 966:36 0 (loop # (*fragment*) # �) >> >> texinfo.scm:966:36: In procedure loop: >> texinfo.scm:966:36: Throw to key `parser-error' with args `(#f "Unknown command" ifdtool)'. > > This one was fixed in commit ec0f3d0a5bdc1f56308aeff5dabfbb3ab18b9810. > May I ask, how these kind of errors slip in? Does the reviewer only look at the technical parts of patches? Thanks Martin