From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brice Waegeneire Subject: bug#40142: CVE checker return false positives Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 16:57:33 +0000 Message-ID: <95d598f98f65efd7a5c89aaf52b80df1@waegenei.re> References: <0bb3b7878b37095b4ed7fa49aee5936f@waegenei.re> <87sgi1znd8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFhRj-0005uC-31 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:58:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFhRi-0006hV-5r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:58:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jFhRi-0006hR-2o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:58:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jFhRi-0007T5-2l for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:58:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87sgi1znd8.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 40142@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, On 2020-03-21 16:25, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Probably the fix would be to preserve the vendor part in the API and to > somehow use it meaningfully. > > Ideas & patches welcome! I'll see what I can write a patch to fix it then. >> Also note the missing / on the first line and it output on `stderr' >> instead of `stdout'. > > What do you mean? I misunderstood the meaning of “gnu/packages/version-control.scm:149:2:” and thought there was a missing / before “gnu/”; this is irrelevant. About the output stream of “guix lint” I think it should output to `stdout', not `stderr' as it's currently the case. Brice.