From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#27261: guix package -u should warn about non-existent packages
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:56:21 +0200
Message-ID: <87zict4jqy.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <878tl654b8.fsf@netris.org> <87wp7z95f1.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170625235326.GA24268@jasmine.lan> <87zicv89fk.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170626183254.GA14748@jasmine.lan> <87zicumvju.fsf@fastmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37805)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dPqzL-0002aq-A7
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:57:08 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dPqzG-00081c-EI
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:57:07 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:38255)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dPqzG-00080s-BC
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:57:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dPqzG-0007T9-0Y
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:57:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27261.B27261.149857179828678@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87zicumvju.fsf@fastmail.com> (Marius Bakke's message of "Mon, 26
	Jun 2017 20:51:49 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: 27261@debbugs.gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:01:03AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>>> Could you check whether =E2=80=9Cguix package -A syncthing=E2=80=9D sho=
ws it there?  The
>>> warning should appear as soon as we=E2=80=99re upgrading a package that=
=E2=80=99s
>>> missing.
>>
>> I get no results when I do `./pre-inst-env guix package -A syncthing`
>> from the repo where I removed qsyncthingtray.
>
> I just came across this today too on a GuixSD system. `guix package -u`
> warned that my not-yet-upstream "icedtea-web" package does not exist,
> but had no problem with "chromium" installed the same way.
>
> No GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH, and ~/.config/guix/latest is a symlink to a `guix
> pull` build. The packages were installed through `./pre-inst-env`.

Hmm it all depends on whether the packages are visible to Guix via
GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH.  Are you using the same Guix in both cases?  No
=E2=80=98sudo=E2=80=99?

Ludo=E2=80=99.