From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#26006: [Website] Integral update proposal Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 09:50:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87zi9aq989.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9xdb2et.fsf@gnu.org> <20171001110213.kb2tz26yyntchonk@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58065) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyvVK-0002JK-7y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 03:51:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyvVG-0004wj-5v for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 03:51:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dyvVG-0004wf-3f for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 03:51:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dyvVF-0003xk-Sf for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2017 03:51:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20171001110213.kb2tz26yyntchonk@abyayala> (ng0@infotropique.org's message of "Sun, 1 Oct 2017 11:02:13 +0000") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: ng0 Cc: 26006@debbugs.gnu.org, sirgazil Hello ng0, ng0 skribis: > what's missing for this branch to be merged? I took a quick build on this > (and because I like the code as a reference), and it looks good. Builds, > maybe some changes from master have to be applied to it (like using > https instead of http at the download URLs). > > Anything missing we could help out with? Sure, not that much is missing. I must say that I=E2=80=99m really sorry t= hat we failed to move forward on this after all the great work sirgazil did! IIRC one of the problems is that the /packages page by default shows all packages, which is too much. We should fix that. Then I think there were tiny issues here and there, nothing big though (since the new site was written from scratch, some of the fine-tuning we did on the old one was lost.) Last, we=E2=80=99ll need to setup redirects for the old blog post URLs, and perhaps for a few other pages. If you could build it, browse it, report/fix issues, and identify redirects that need to be made, that would help tremendously! I=E2=80=99ve= felt lonely while working on it, so I=E2=80=99m really happy if you can take a c= loser look. ;-) Let=E2=80=99s team up and get this done! Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.