From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: bug#32646: emacs-guix doesn't build, because of guile-gcrypt Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 17:56:51 +0300 Message-ID: <87zhwp4czw.fsf@gmail.com> References: <877ejzpx00.fsf@lassieur.org> <875zzjpwhi.fsf@lassieur.org> <87pnxrkn5f.fsf@gnu.org> <871sa64dzd.fsf@gmail.com> <878t49zaoh.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51046) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNch-0006nQ-Ra for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:57:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNcd-0004b9-TC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:57:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNcc-0004Zb-93 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:57:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fzNcc-0003BH-7d for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:57:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <878t49zaoh.fsf@gmail.com> (George Clemmer's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2018 10:31:10 -0400") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: George Clemmer Cc: 32646@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur George Clemmer (2018-09-10 10:31 -0400) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2018-09-06 11:09 +0200) wrote: >> >>>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:752:25: In procedure dispatch-exception: >>>> no code for module (guix hash) >>>> make[2]: [Makefile:556: emacs-guix/hash.go] Error 1 (ignored) >>> >>> I suppose Emacs-Guix might need to use (gcrypt hash) instead. >>> Any ideas, Alex? >> >> Ouch, there is no (guix hash) anymore. > > Looking at commit '57d70dbab * master origin/master gnu: Add yad.' it > seems that 'guix hash' is removed but still documented. Is a > re-implementation of 'guix hash' coming? Or is it the intent to remove > 'guix hash'. If so, ISTM this is be a meaningful loss of guix usability. No, no, the command "guix hash" did not go anywhere. It's just (guix hash) module that was removed. It was replaced by (gcrypt hash) module from "guile-gcrypt" package, which is a new dependency of Guix. --=20 Alex