From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#33470: bug#34249: [PATCH] guix package: Avoid spinner at end of output. Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 15:32:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87zhr9f0nq.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20190129195031.21496-1-mail@cbaines.net> <20190129211645.08cdbd2d@scratchpost.org> <8736pbm6ac.fsf@gnu.org> <87o97p5a6w.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grOG7-0003IR-71 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:33:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grOG6-0002hX-9z for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:33:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34916) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1grOG6-0002hF-6p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:33:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1grOG5-0006gp-Vb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 09:33:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87o97p5a6w.fsf@cbaines.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Christopher Baines Cc: 34249-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 33470-done@debbugs.gnu.org Christopher Baines writes: > I've tried out the change you pushed here [1], and it looks good to me > :) I can't see anything odd in the output now. > > 1: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=3D7473bce207af84= 6312d5167a398f5f20bbf3e896 With this change I see that there are now two empty lines between =E2=80=9Cdownloading=E2=80=9D lines. The updating line flickers, too. I wonder if maybe too much is deleted. I can=E2=80=99t give specifics, but= it did seem a little weird when I observed the output on my i686 machine. -- Ricardo