From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#36100: Jami leaks memory
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2019 22:41:42 +0200
Message-ID: <87zhmmsfi1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <16b135f47a5.c48c9e1512716.4579175065592128011@zoho.com>
 <878su7xamv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <16b4cb481c8.bec2698023794.900017298306389181@zoho.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53492)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hbA4J-0005cn-RE
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:42:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hbA4I-0006lb-Ov
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:42:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48837)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1hbA4I-0006lQ-HS
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:42:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1hbA4I-0007MM-Dh
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2019 16:42:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36100.B36100.156037211628277@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <16b4cb481c8.bec2698023794.900017298306389181@zoho.com>
 (sirgazil@zoho.com's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:20:26 -0500")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com>
Cc: 36100 <36100@debbugs.gnu.org>

sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:

> ---- On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 07:15:36 -0500 Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.or=
g> wrote ----
>
>  > Hi sirgazil,=20
>  >=20=20
>  > sirgazil <sirgazil@zoho.com> skribis:=20
>  >=20=20
>  > > When I run Jami in the GNU system installed with Guix, I see that it=
s process called ".gnome-ring-rea" starts using around 36 MiB, but then inc=
reases over time at slow pace. After some hours, I notice it reaches 1 GiB =
of memory usage. I have to finalize the process to release memory.=20
>  >=20=20
>  > Do you think it=E2=80=99s a Guix-specific issue?=20
>  >=20=20
>  > I would expect it to not be Guix-specific.  Could you report the issue=
=20
>  > upstream?=20
>
>
> Oh, I think one of my messages about this issue didn't arrived. The leak =
in the version available in Guix is known and fixed upstream.

Nice.  Should we apply their patch, or upgrade our package?

> I thought that maybe this bug report could be used as a reminder to updat=
e the package definition of Jami in Guix to a version that fixes the leak?

I think it=E2=80=99s better if the bug report is actionable.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.