From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Subject: bug#36574: The installer recommends wrong initrd module names Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 13:15:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhlmywbf.fsf@nckx> References: <87wogqxim8.fsf@riseup.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAa0-0003RF-8N for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:16:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAZw-0003QF-K8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:16:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAZu-0003MK-GZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:16:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hlAZu-0004C7-9Y for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 07:16:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87wogqxim8.fsf@riseup.net> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 36574@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Hullo, Meiyo Peng wrote: > So the problem is that the Guix installer recommends wrong > initrd module > names to user. Do you think this is the revenge of [0]? If so, could you merge the two? Kind regards, T G-R [0]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=34902 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCXSXI5AAKCRANsP+IT1Vt eemnAQCGqJ+pEiY2CsH2lVLsMWfeb2AA0lY//+PwjZvZeVu19wD/bUZaaQfNQfhA CVyFc3pvvmL/r3jXYrgLt79K5sGLDAI= =iErg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--