From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix Subject: bug#37437: hash mismatch for emacs-elixir-mode Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 11:39:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhj039s8.fsf@nckx> References: <874l1bky9f.fsf@inv.alid.pw> <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> Reply-To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iAsuy-0003Dc-AD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:40:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAsux-00015k-3w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:40:04 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iAsuw-00015g-Vo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:40:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iAsuw-0006rL-QT for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 05:40:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87imprb0bd.fsf@nckx> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 37437-done@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_?= =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=B6fling?= --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tobias Geerinckx-Rice =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > I can check my substitute server tomorrow for the =E2=80=98original=E2=80= =99 > (091cizxg1aw8bkj58y048mj020ssapjflav633z9bl6gmi10dy4v) tarball=20 > if > nobody else has a copy. Guix servers don't seem to. I didn't have the chance while in LAN range, and the point's now=20 moot anyway. Thanks, Bj=C3=B6rn! Bj=C3=B6rn H=C3=B6fling =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Is [MELPA] not as stable as the name suggests. Indeed[0], quite unfortunate. Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://guix-devel.gnu.narkive.com/6iiqs1hT/patch-emacs-danneskjold-theme#p= ost3 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl2DTLcACgkQ2Imw8BjF STz+zQ/+NWLUtDrf2Kqmn39F1Znc9wTEgGFfDEDJAoCztGfng0aos07knb4aZm5G qUU04MxX5VxTNGMlNSC3Zn8U7dk3ebotMXWPf9Hr5BFM58ptolqCrWdV7cVhtafJ VfWmn3EhsvSVu1fFhgYS+E1zrhaKkeAxliqzWPfedjKhUawgXYA51NbYDAVKRVQj 7QzhqRb5Ws/ETtwn/ay5WVlVmCjxfBDGq5aZg1lI5UV/cTSnNj3mHh6khJSXOlwi yIqey/R08CLTdyECcUM9jLIJnjYezUq2CbSWRTOLM9BX4cmC6i2DkhPQnLBQalTA xh2cnFnoh3BH1gfMz6RUJiXagjJKyK7nRGbmNtM+v2w7eCZaBBVZ2WDxdLF1+5OH D0zjsq/ZVK+D3IhgBNe6e6LLYj1mH/4TExDW5grnei43KvrQc64UQcocQh3vapEK ZyUz4ZLGGZnsZ/orTMJVKvAP2M0DS2dkyxvyX2k3FCqN1MUH0yjlqvJuzmaKGXqO wkLjBqa6W/yxPbK0U118ZeqplAwvjunxvEz1d0nN+UX72ExM5I2wPJhW+EDnRM7X ToPWKR/UUBzcgNPjIEj8hHJZcheSJs+MBxKa1IIlhU83kWrAUqw3vWa38C8q1eYb +l1W4pC6FpRaTg4DFY2kBlOtGBTlBxMcsZv4OFek186xsOEG9p8= =5c9J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--