From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 0L72BnUeYl+MLAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:17:25 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id UL/FAnUeYl/oWwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:17:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 590549400EF for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:17:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:47242 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYFO-0007ye-OU for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:17:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYF4-0007x1-L9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:17:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYF4-0003RX-Ai for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYF4-0008Va-5W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#42688: Running a script with `guix repl` doesn't "see" additional channels using (%package-module-path) Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42688 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: pkill9 Received: via spool by 42688-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42688.160026576432570 (code B ref 42688); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 42688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2020 14:16:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYE7-0008TG-NE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:16:04 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f48.google.com ([209.85.221.48]:41725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kIYE6-0008SX-0b for 42688@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 10:16:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f48.google.com with SMTP id w5so7095186wrp.8 for <42688@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:16:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SPMnsqqsWwon7Zj6kFXPL2UuGuDrtmBk9ukRVn6oSP0=; b=Nool+BxKzKDpNuueW4YvDgdjxgMdtWFMRdrVHRWizm57dUtPeUZ9uZsSdjBd5YhefJ DzJQNZcBp0vi/2zT4KCg1eHcNj1tDzxEBs0j+udbRtZ0Ltlu5hQcPOez+PQUPf0pMJEM uGm3uvYNitjpFMAotY4vg3JuLvPxz07Hdpel+TXL6x4X4hroSquiav4br/ZZQRtM1AMa TrNqYc3GdMF8v4rfvoz5eF6fewMvsBsJi/2ie7kDo+NbhGJos+dNhVEfdIFJ0aD1JG9C VencASrqWPj9xje9hixkgZkur8bKZ64/PkcYS/ayLGOhbG4AB8jo2IyTk2Rh/FLPVrjk p79w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SPMnsqqsWwon7Zj6kFXPL2UuGuDrtmBk9ukRVn6oSP0=; b=npo448ocyNIYjg4nU4Q4z+SMwrVQdXd99jNoSoU9GUfIKaB1i/M1ULbAox03ODFOkh SE7WFjAgpI9Xd7+DcP9nh9/a0m/x8u809yWCD5qcy8HBDdN+fv0+rYO9+qFx0x3jtUu4 jB806RaPlMysCjVb04yvpysX7/w8PoAvUY4voSpdw2BxJwBBOhiNjB44Xasz56nccYm8 95mPEKxho0JIq3elav8DWkuf0yUkkeM3fBkl9kgupOjXHQnNwLJVis3Vr7GYGPHPubsj lr2RpvVA9UTk/lpmiMmKhhWqVbP4hp/ywothO53O7etCmSL6BysoNqy7gn131RxfzKj7 4SEg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306oVWVwmpyWIGIgMaK6QGnlQ2HXsncJpOCxMuJnoJa7EYZcn7B CdIRLxgaCW6+Ntwmz0dsZN72ib0zOC0RUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybFmFZI1BuM7Wp5h/fkDOou2QMNckJ2QbBhP+12H8Mi3RwqB+ptXOOFi/japnBpo0AHdEoLQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e44b:: with SMTP id t11mr4143620wrm.101.1600265755840; Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm34029284wro.34.2020.09.16.07.15.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Sep 2020 07:15:55 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun References: <20200803043331.78b20336@runbox.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 16:15:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200803043331.78b20336@runbox.com> (pkill9@runbox.com's message of "Mon, 3 Aug 2020 04:33:31 +0100") Message-ID: <87zh5pq02t.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 42688@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Nool+BxK; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: uYMRFSbaUJdk Dear, Thank you for the report. Well, it seems similar to #37399 . On Mon, 03 Aug 2020 at 04:33, pkill9 wrote: > fold-available-packages uses this to search for packages, which I am > using for a script. As a result, the script doesn't know about packages > from the additional channels. What happens if you try the =E2=80=9Ctrick=E2=80=9D using GUILE_LOAD_PATH? Or the option =E2=80=99-L=E2=80=99? (Well, maybe a solution for the mean time if you do not have too much channels). All the best, simon