From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id SHGUEa5CgWC4cgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:32:30 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id XOMiDa5CgWBUfQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:32:30 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906CCBFFE for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:32:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVhE-000083-OM for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:32:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38322) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVgp-00005N-7b for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:32:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVgo-0002sN-Jm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:32:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVgo-0004RC-Gx for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:32:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#47744: nfs-root-fs test is failing Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47744 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Stefan X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.161908386816973 (code B ref -1); Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:32:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2021 09:31:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVfw-0004Ph-D6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:31:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:39112) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVfr-0004PQ-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:31:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVfr-00085a-5w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:31:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46265) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVfp-0002HG-7E; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:31:01 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:9576:8bbf:4795:82ee] (port=53090 helo=meije) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lZVfc-0001zn-T9; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 05:30:51 -0400 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87zgy2r4e7.fsf@gnu.org> <5D1C7300-09CB-49C6-8256-5CD25563FE20@vodafonemail.de> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:30:47 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan's message of "Sun, 18 Apr 2021 20:29:40 +0200") Message-ID: <87zgxqmzso.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 47744@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1619083949; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=FX5vyLzHBGEVTQMCXWaoFqCSemX8DKwM6bL9NxvqO7o=; b=VRpqZuN8mS0BQ8ZdAM1v3lc1mgpgpdVs5WmCKCKbuaf7CpuqfLwrzzj8nu+ibn/qu8N8JM U5qBoTybmKqphUhitb5ZURxbVsqWwe5/ZSlYdXsuXZgyo7ces1TZn3IT5CUnJrd7tt6Ohd sBMdQ7roQe54Yn/SSBaRcZZjhya0RrfKCeJuT4lRYyoOxt7dgaHHWWRy43lpKJm11a5gAj 381OCpeTHh9PQeWmHvVJHiPv1xaZcXVLY8bai4ZZ7em3fHW1Zr2dlHwZdUMTu8Owdc7HRt lu+HAw7oVcLrbQSWRGBmLyY/XX6yV015W3Mq8SjYcKdkJIJBMgCbs4rdOBZbtA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1619083949; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TQGqM+jn/CRUf68bw7P8ETlwP9FZSlqsc9leN/NCEL75nn4edmhS40W0c0oyWwDZgg8HXY XobiF+at/b7vi1WoDN7HxxXY3ePtoajdxfofhFDaRKwU583Bd/omkRdARAiAZU1U9P8LwA lU1twZdBXOpffh9HNGppVmpMHfxh0jgN9B2waoldSBWoFqxGVEOkDjidSigK4TaAanXACo dUD1ujZyZHOihXk2YfXOL5z+P7NrreXc+o7hTqa5bSy7DTJTtaUs8xR1671+uNoaFR/P37 OLWKo6bihcjHx2gPKhZ71cgnVwXMiOjUEoun/7TauqQeX3twE6fRPsBOlIuFuw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.94 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 906CCBFFE X-Spam-Score: -2.94 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: jqi/kXiwktiS Hello Stefan, Thanks for having a look! > I=E2=80=99m now sure that this test has never been working. I also share the impression that this test never worked. Plus the actual version has a lot of FIXME and commented lines that scare me off. > With the attached changes, the NFS server side tests are passing, but > the NFS client is missing an own IP address when trying to mount its > root file-system, which results in this error when executing =E2=80=9Cmake > check-system TESTS=3Dnfs-root=E2=80=9D: I think I'll remove the "nfs-root-fs" test for now. To fulfil their role its important that the system test are functional. Otherwise its hard to distinguish a test failing because of a regression from a test that has always been broken. Any objections? Thanks, Mathieu