From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id aPLiDfVLdmH3qwAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:17:25 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id iP2dCfVLdmG5ZwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 06:17:25 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 832981ADC for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:17:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40414 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1metIR-0000A1-FT for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:17:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1metI7-00007v-4u for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:17:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1metI6-0005Yb-SI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1metI6-0002EQ-L6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#51383: noobie way of incorrectly using (guix records) Resent-From: Joshua Branson Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 06:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 51383 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 51383@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.16351425788515 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 06:17:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2021 06:16:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1metHN-0002DG-Nc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:16:17 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:42852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1metHL-0002D9-NC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:16:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60232) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1metHK-0007uS-Up for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:16:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]:2506) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1metHI-0004g3-08 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:16:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 22438b81 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:16:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=date :message-id:from:to:subject; s=20190914; bh=zOYsXI+7flYC0ZBSNcR9 5It6MdUCX7jgZ7t9gvfMKes=; b=vRxVUe3EQk1f1I4ch/I4qV0ydeIM/zNG2hOP AK6ZSkvS/L/0USIcEFVyDBuiOh+XpJ53Kf1w4UCPHFAf3BEwIKTfLG5389GrgCaG 13u2PGVq1vg4a3yCo4H3lVAqxi/khfkH8pXSoFysXCoZ1q5BiQVLgRBVwrJIKXhc /F/X87gJ52wdjKMFxY9rdWDofKoxSMYuknJ1b7zocIplzXVu1lcqxF4evNtXNv7x yt96BM+qw5vJEKfYp8Df6IYv8g6X26CS9F4ilfZX5GuLH6xn0Z2cR/FsFbPv73Wr 93qw9EWeLME6ptCW2kTXG3owOsVxo2qx2WdoD44vZcFBuf50UQ== Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 41f952ac for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 64dbd0da for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5f34d345 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 02:15:54 -0400 Message-Id: <87zgqxiq91.fsf@dismail.de> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" Reply-to: Joshua Branson From: Joshua Branson via Bug reports for GNU Guix X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1635142644; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe: list-post:dkim-signature; bh=++eDy0TpB4oxEGNxfY0rEMuLsGQBquWlwxz2W05gPDY=; b=Xbg/Fw3NBee/O1MMNGXYYxYMwdJOPwjL/92uxDs/F+ut/vbIe8ZK7vNTg9QPl1NjfdD3vu WVnYffQlSLyDCjUNXNwbUEUH23XEgy9EZbTxukcOCkSaRM6cMiTCpE6/7Zb1irM8o8wscQ 9T9udcg/XHNSLbH9WF+LPID1dGqGfYBn8djQ3JqCQFqQZG4L+PJVn1Ir8Qy/igV/FDylK8 5Fngxf2m4yNrO8T/vVyY+jGtC/gSWLRp+YHe02OARka5bBANFUAO7V5NJmoXZFZpHJUJBV 6Cz46fyNGb+zXB7t8sk0HEK8TcsKSN2MyLLvYm1AmGC+4hd8gPJyYusiYcLSbg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1635142644; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lorQ/qOFvEbWxAzFkLVEu5eDuW7C8H4U3cNVVP5mvh80eFKEMNxv304yPBfJJ+y40ioJv0 5xqVuTC21N/kQT/IPxj9FOZpH+OMXjOjEAO9Cpcri6FrnvNO09B4rGLo09MxVKA58FiKzS wGG44iwYAFYPxPwKCR4ptjg8Z9rCok3R23yT83VpJPRgQ+BTPq4abJxGQy59pzeiONsXzr CIDRyIr6w1HuFXXmczb24VD/HZ0GGBIqZoOF5ueJ9umOfxe73mY0WUQ45vV7J7AfzmV9kZ IlJga9PtGZocGSk8UJ9Mf6XsutwX0EdbSUHFJV8K5TY2aV7wRtSQCZPe+RyGtA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=vRxVUe3E; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.43 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=vRxVUe3E; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 832981ADC X-Spam-Score: -2.43 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: 2B8Lzl/k+wK7 So I made a pretty noobie-like mistake a few minutes ago. When one tries to make a (record-configuration), he invariably create an infinite number of records. The guile compiler eventually runs out of memory and stops compiling. (use-modules (guix records)) (define-record-type* record-configuration make-record-configuration record-configuration? (command record-configuration-command ;; the error is here is on the next line (default (record-configuration)))) (record-configuration) This is not possible with (srfi sfri-9) (use-modules (srfi srfi-9)) (define-record-type (make-employee name age (make-employeee 5 5 5)) employee? (name employee-name) (age employee-age set-employee-age!) (salary employee-salary set-employee-salary!)) (make-employee) The above results in a syntax error. Is this a "feature" and not a bug? I feel like this is a trivial bug, and I am certain that other bugs are of greater importance. Thanks, Joshua