bug#72780: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-treemacs: add missing package to propagated-inputs

bug#72780: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-treemacs: add missing package to propagated-inputs

[Rodrigo Morales]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 194 bytes --]


This is the first time I'm sending a patch to the guix project. If this
is not the correct way to send patches to Guix, please let me know so
that I don't make the same mistake in the future.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-emacs-treemacs-add-missing-package-to-propagated.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1137 bytes --]

From 51811d0ba74704b57822263d684604606ad43da7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rodrigo Morales <rodrigo@morales.pe>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 13:29:56 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-treemacs: add missing package to propagated-inputs

The package emacs-cfrs is not included in the list of
propagated-inputs at emacs-treemacs, but it should be included,
because some of the features of emacs-treemacs use cfrs, see
https://github.com/Alexander-Miller/treemacs/blob/2377d231bcb4ff6841cbf6a7c1e4b6747e26ddd0/src/elisp/treemacs-interface.el#L47-L48
---
 gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
index cb7269d6b9..bfa61ee1e5 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/emacs-xyz.scm
@@ -31826,7 +31826,8 @@ (define-public emacs-treemacs
            emacs-ht
            emacs-hydra
            emacs-pfuture
-           emacs-s))
+           emacs-s
+           emacs-cfrs))
     (home-page "https://github.com/Alexander-Miller/treemacs")
     (synopsis "Emacs tree style file explorer")
     (description
-- 
2.34.1

bug#72780: [PATCH] gnu: emacs-treemacs: add missing package to propagated-inputs

[Nicolas Goaziou via Bug reports for GNU Guix]

Hello,

Rodrigo Morales <rodrigo-mailing-lists@morales.pe> writes:

> This is the first time I'm sending a patch to the guix project. If this
> is not the correct way to send patches to Guix, please let me know so
> that I don't make the same mistake in the future.

Thank you for your contribution.

I'm surprised it arrived in the wrong mailing list. Did you follow the
steps mentioned in the manual (at "(guix) Submitting Patches"), or
arguably better, used mumi?

Anyhow I applied your patch. I just reordered inputs alphabetically.

Regards,
-- 
Nicolas Goaziou