From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#26797: qemu looks for smbd at /usr/sbin Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 15:03:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3ua2l3c.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87zieq2sdx.fsf@elephly.net> <878tmaw3us.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6zNT-0001uJ-N7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 09:04:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6zNS-0003JD-4o for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 09:04:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d6zNS-0003J7-2T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 09:04:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d6zNR-0006xU-Nu for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 09:04:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <878tmaw3us.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 26797@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > See commit b344c505f4dff2ecbe981f0a0a3c3d67b222dcca, which removed the > dependency and Samba. Prior to that commit, QEMU recorded the absolute > file name of ‘smbd’. > > The problem is that Samba is big: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ guix size qemu |tail -1 > total: 710.5 MiB > $ guix size qemu samba |tail -1 > total: 1203.5 MiB > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Right, that’s not good. > Thus it’d be best if we modified QEMU to search for ‘smbd’ in $PATH. I agree! I can’t work on this right now, unfortunately, but I’ll revisit this at some point in the future if nobody else beats me to it. Thanks for your input! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net