ng0 <ng0@pragmatique.xyz> writes:

> #lvm on freenode.net says we are on our own and that the method (in general)
> to statically build lvm2 is considered fragile.
> The comment was that we need to make libm available, statically, as well for
> lvm2.
> The only person shown by git blame gnu/packages/linux.scm for lvm2-static is
> Ludovic.

I'm afraid I'm to blame for this (try git log --grep lvm2-static) :(

I'll try to sort out what happened.