From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#31825: guix offload fails with guix-authenticate error
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:13:08 -0400
Message-ID: <87y3f7o9fv.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87y3firpjs.fsf@gmail.com> <877en1xbpq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87bmc87rlm.fsf@gmail.com> <87zhzswl4s.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87bmc75wqv.fsf@gmail.com> <8736xjqg5c.fsf@gnu.org>
	<871sd354mb.fsf@gmail.com> <871sd2u8zo.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vaae40wh.fsf@gmail.com>
	<FA68E4DB-4C0B-4680-915C-4D1CCB5989A4@riseup.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48678)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fWBaP-0000f3-UG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:14:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fWBaL-0002B2-Tp
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:14:05 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51666)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1fWBaL-0002Aw-P4
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:14:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1fWBaL-0004oC-KL
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:14:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.31825.B.152963360518433@debbugs.gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48568)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>) id 1fWBZc-0000c2-DB
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:13:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>) id 1fWBZb-0001jr-JO
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jun 2018 22:13:16 -0400
In-Reply-To: <FA68E4DB-4C0B-4680-915C-4D1CCB5989A4@riseup.net> (swedebugia's
	message of "Wed, 20 Jun 2018 05:54:44 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net>
Cc: 31825@debbugs.gnu.org

Hello!

swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net> writes:

> Good job hunting the bug. =F0=9F=98=80

Thanks; credits to Ludovic for providing me with the right debugging
tool (and incantation).

> Are you going to report a new bug about incorrect or insufficient error m=
essages?=20
> Thanks for the summary.=20

I think we can track it here for now. If it becomes a bigger task it
might be better to create an issue for itself.

Maxim