From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#33325: xpra doesn't work out-of-the-box (implicit dependencies) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 17:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87y39huo9x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8736sa2vcm.fsf@inria.fr> <20181109160321.3346add3@mykolab.com> <87a7mepuxl.fsf@inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52813) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQxEY-0000NW-CP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:26:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQx5i-0003Xe-Ny for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:17:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gQx5i-0003XP-Kt for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:17:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gQx5i-0000zd-Cj for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 11:17:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <87a7mepuxl.fsf@inria.fr> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?'s\?\= message of "Mon, 12 Nov 2018 09:21:58 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Rutger Helling Cc: 33325@debbugs.gnu.org Hello, ludovic.courtes@inria.fr (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > $ guix environment --ad-hoc xpra --pure > [env]$ xpra start :100 > Warning: Xorg binary not found, assuming the wrapper is needed! > ludo@ribbon ~/src/guix [env]$ Entering daemon mode; any further errors wi= ll be reported to: > /run/user/1000/xpra/:100.log > > [env]$ xpra list > Warning: Xorg binary not found, assuming the wrapper is needed! > No xpra sessions found FWIW I get the same problem with the recent xpra 2.4.2 update. > I believe the problem should be reproducible in a =E2=80=98--pure=E2=80= =99 environment. > Perhaps the missing Python modules mentioned in the log are the root > cause? Thoughts? Thanks in advance, Ludo=E2=80=99.