Hey Ludo,

> That would ensure we’re only changing Guile’s notion of the terminal
> width and not interfering with other tools we might launch as child
> processes.
>
> Thoughts?

Seems like a better idea indeed. Here's an update patch.

About using 200 or a much larger value as Danny suggested, I don't have
a strong opinion myself. WDYT?

Thanks,

Mathieu