From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Subject: bug#36069: Menu-based installer unusable through noVNC Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:26:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3285xyu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r28848q1.fsf@gnu.org> <875zpjwx88.fsf@gnu.org> <17584F6F-7F50-4BFF-9A7B-206CF4596A79@vllmrt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51110) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hac8U-00013B-Ft for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 04:28:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hac8S-0006il-Ji for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 04:28:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hac8Q-0006gQ-4m for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 04:28:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hac8P-00018l-Vm for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Jun 2019 04:28:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <17584F6F-7F50-4BFF-9A7B-206CF4596A79@vllmrt.net> (Robert Vollmert's message of "Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:13:01 +0200") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Robert Vollmert Cc: 36069-done@debbugs.gnu.org Hi, Robert Vollmert skribis: >> On 5. Jun 2019, at 23:14, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>=20 >> Robert Vollmert skribis: >>=20 >>>> On 5. Jun 2019, at 12:39, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>>>=20 >>>> I=E2=80=99ve never used noVNC, but doesn=E2=80=99t it allow you to zoo= m out or >>>> something? The kernel (KMS) knows what it=E2=80=99s doing, so it seem= s to me >>>> that the problem is that noVNC doesn=E2=80=99t realize what the actual= screen >>>> size is. Does the Internet have something to say wrt. noVNC vs. kmsco= n? >>>=20 >>> I don=E2=80=99t seem to get any controls to resize the display; in prev= ious >>> situations it has seemed to switch modes correctly automatically. That >>> said, I=E2=80=99m happy to believe that the bug is with noVNC =E2=80=94= I=E2=80=99ve reported >>> it with arpnetworks and will pass it on to noVNC once I know which >>> version is running. >>=20 >> Alright, let us know how it goes so we can happily close the bug. :-) > > It turns out arpnetworks are running an older forked version of noVNC, > so this might well have been fixed in the meantime. Not solved, but I > don=E2=80=99t intend to pursue this further at this point, will close. At= least > it=E2=80=99s on record if it shows up again. OK, thanks for investigating! Ludo=E2=80=99.