From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Lemmer Webber Subject: bug#36964: Some importer tests failing? Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:05:27 -0400 Message-ID: <87y304oi60.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56971) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSCH-00011u-SE for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:06:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSCE-00037j-OO for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:06:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58885) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSCA-0002yF-Ro for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:06:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSCA-0004Tt-Jv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:06:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSBe-0000yp-G0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:05:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSBd-0001ey-Ig for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:05:30 -0400 Received: from dustycloud.org ([50.116.34.160]:44892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hvSBd-0001bB-En for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2019 16:05:29 -0400 Received: from twig (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dustycloud.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 371402661E for ; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 16:05:28 -0400 (EDT) List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 36964@debbugs.gnu.org A number of tests, including in cpan.scm, crate.scm, gem.scm are failing for me. Not sure if it's just me or not... Some example output: actual-value: #f actual-error: + (wrong-type-arg + "string-prefix?" + "Wrong type argument in position ~A (expecting ~A): ~S" + (2 "string" #f) + (#f)) result: FAIL ;;; (fail #f #f) actual-value: #f result: FAIL actual-value: #f actual-error: + (wrong-type-arg + "string-prefix?" + "Wrong type argument in position ~A (expecting ~A): ~S" + (2 "string" #f) + (#f)) result: FAIL I'm guessing something changed in the general importer code?