From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#36747: Official MesCC bootstrap binaries differ from my locally
 built ones
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:44:50 +0200
Message-ID: <87y2z9ec71.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <875znwcoo9.fsf@netris.org> <87h86mdaex.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8736i5a7mb.fsf@netris.org> <87mugdbc9r.fsf@gnu.org>
 <8736i3iyas.fsf@devup.no> <87zhkbhd07.fsf@devup.no>
 <87v9uz4msh.fsf@netris.org> <87woffh66h.fsf@devup.no>
 <874l26y9j0.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0guuwt4.fsf@netris.org>
 <87zhjw1gfm.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7bvnts4.fsf@netris.org>
 <87y2zfq746.fsf@gnu.org> <874l22of8l.fsf@netris.org>
 <87zhjuoarz.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhjumu88.fsf@netris.org>
 <87k1aym7kf.fsf@netris.org> <87d0gpdjmi.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87lfvblqiv.fsf@netris.org> <871rx3imj7.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87v9uexwfk.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54075)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i42kZ-0005xb-Ex
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:45:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1i42kY-00051j-Fp
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:45:03 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46264)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1i42kY-00051Z-CI
 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 08:45:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.36747.B36747.156725549921836@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87v9uexwfk.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Fri, 30
 Aug 2019 15:52:20 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
 <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: 36747@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Thanks.  The next evaluation got further, but eventually failed.  Again,
>>> there seems no way to get any details on what went wrong from the web
>>> interface:
>>>
>>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-core-updates
>>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/7029
>>
>> A Guile build of
>> /gnu/store/lbbgpkrs9mpw68k1bz0dwpi8ch6gp557-guile-2.2.6.drv had timed
>> out.  I restarted manually earlier today with a larger timeout.  It
>> succeeded and a new evaluation is now =E2=80=9Cin progress=E2=80=9D=E2=
=80=A6
>
> Thanks.  It has since failed again, same as before.

This time it was ENOSPC of a Guile derivation.  I=E2=80=99ve restarted it a=
nd
then restarted the evaluation.

> I'm unable to get any information from the web interface on what went
> wrong.

Yup.  :-/

Ludo=E2=80=99.