unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>
Cc: 32548@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#32548: Cuirass: Performance monitoring
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 19:51:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2lmlox2.fsf@cbaines.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d02zge5e.fsf@gnu.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1391 bytes --]


Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
>> As discussed earlier today on IRC with Clément, we could add performance
>> monitoring capabilities to Cuirass.  Interesting metrics would be:
>>
>>   • time of push to time of evaluation completion;
>>
>>   • time of evaluation completion to time of build completion.
>
> Small update on that one. With Cuirass commit
> 154232bc767d002f69aa6bb1cdddfd108b98584b, we now have the following
> timestamps:
>
> * Checkout commit time.
> * Evaluation creation.
> * Evaluation checkouts completion.
> * Evaluation completion.
>
> For the first timestamp, I'm using Guile-Git to extract the commit time,
> which is not the commit push time. In fact, I think there is no such
> thing as "commit push time" in git.

I had this issue with the Guix Data Service as well, it uses the
timestamp in the email sent by the Savannah git hook, which is the
closest I've got to "commit push time".

> We can still compute the metric 'time of commit to time of evaluation
> completion', but it's less relevant than the proposed 'time of push to
> time of evaluation completion'.

As someone can commit, then potentially push those commits hours later,
assuming no one else has pushed, this data might be a bit noisy. Time
between Curiass noticing the new commit to the evaluation completion
might be cleaner.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 962 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-06 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-27 22:33 bug#32548: Cuirass: Performance monitoring Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-06 14:42 ` Mathieu Othacehe
2020-09-06 18:51   ` Christopher Baines [this message]
2020-09-07  8:11     ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-10 13:26       ` Mathieu Othacehe
2020-09-14 13:34         ` Mathieu Othacehe
2020-09-14 14:10           ` zimoun
2020-09-16  2:21             ` Bonface M. K.
2020-09-14 19:27           ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-17 10:07             ` Mathieu Othacehe
2020-09-17 20:22               ` Ludovic Courtès
2020-09-16 15:56           ` Andreas Enge
2020-09-17  7:10             ` Mathieu Othacehe
2020-09-18 12:21               ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y2lmlox2.fsf@cbaines.net \
    --to=mail@cbaines.net \
    --cc=32548@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).