From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 4LvHD8es/l8tHgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:18:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id EKd5C8es/l9UaQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:18:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D38D9404FD for ; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43520 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbM4-0004AE-P1 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:18:12 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38904) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLu-00048p-6r for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:18:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLu-0000zP-05 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:18:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLt-0004uO-SI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:18:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45835: (gnu machine digital-ocean) installs old Guix Resent-From: Mathieu Othacehe Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45835 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Received: via spool by 45835-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45835.161052584718828 (code B ref 45835); Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:18:01 +0000 Received: (at 45835) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2021 08:17:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLL-0004tc-8c for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:17:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45626) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLI-0004tQ-Uh for 45835@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:17:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLD-0000fy-K8; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:17:19 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:19b:d9a0:1538:87ab:3a95:7600] (port=55206 helo=cervin) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kzbLD-00047S-3x; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 03:17:19 -0500 From: Mathieu Othacehe References: <87v9c1d8hs.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 09:17:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87v9c1d8hs.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:46:07 +0100") Message-ID: <87y2gxuu7m.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45835@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 8D38D9404FD X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: UKUZrtvYmWel Hello Ricardo, > I also wonder if there might not be a better way to deploy Guix quickly, > for example by using a relocatable pack of Guix and using =E2=80=9Cguix c= opy=E2=80=9D > instead of executing a shell script. I think that building a Guix System image and creating a droplet out of it using the DigitalOcean API, as I described here[1] would be a better solution. Thanks, Mathieu [1]: https://othacehe.org/hosting-a-blog-using-only-scheme.html