From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OG2MAChrGGC2aAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:57:12 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id wHf5NydrGGBvSwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:57:11 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D7ED9402AB for ; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 20:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43572 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gFy-0000Bj-E4 for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:57:10 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gFq-0000A4-RJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:57:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gFq-0007On-Ig for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:57:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gFq-0002vi-I7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#45826: SBCL / Common Lisp packages fail to build on aarch64 Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45826 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Leo Famulari Received: via spool by 45826-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45826.161221298711220 (code B ref 45826); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 20:57:02 +0000 Received: (at 45826) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 20:56:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33394 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gFG-0002uu-Sw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:56:27 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gFF-0002ui-JE for 45826@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:56:26 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:32953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gF9-000728-Us; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:56:19 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=51838 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l6gEw-0005nG-EW; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:56:17 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87eeioczws.fsf@yamatai> <877dod1al9.fsf@yamatai> <87mtx7hpwy.fsf@gnu.org> <87pn21hxwp.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 13 =?UTF-8?Q?Pluvi=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 21:56:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:17:05 -0500") Message-ID: <87y2g7ik2i.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 45826@debbugs.gnu.org, guix-sysadmin@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6D7ED9402AB X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: XTiLdyP5voeH Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:13:58PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Now, I think we should avoid papering over CI configuration issues (did >> I get that right?) by changing package definitions. > > Yes, that's idiomatic English, if that is what you were asking about. > > And I agree, the package definitions shouldn't include workarounds for > CI problems. This time I wasn=E2=80=99t asking about English :-), but rather about wheth= er the patch Efraim provided was indeed to paper over our CI problems. Ludo=E2=80=99.