From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id GJARADu6PGDAdgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:56:11 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id KPddNzq6PGDPdwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:56:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4002527E4F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 10:56:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35272 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfHd-0004F7-3I for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:56:09 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfHW-0004Ez-9w for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:56:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfHW-0003CT-32 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:56:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfHW-0004Si-39 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:56:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46779: GnuTLS uses the hard-coded /etc/ssl/certs location for TLS certificates Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:56:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46779 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxim Cournoyer Received: via spool by 46779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46779.161459250417064 (code B ref 46779); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:56:02 +0000 Received: (at 46779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 09:55:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfGa-0004RA-2l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:55:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfGY-0004Qe-M2 for 46779@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:55:03 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfGT-0002Op-DZ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:54:57 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=50280 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lGfGS-00027Z-Ua; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 04:54:57 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87im6f9aq2.fsf@gmail.com> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 11 =?UTF-8?Q?Vent=C3=B4se?= an 229 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:54:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87im6f9aq2.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:03:01 -0500") Message-ID: <87y2f7td00.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46779@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614592570; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=Fexif/hPHfETFzYrsLi8Q4sE7u0LkiNnApKhdiaypns=; b=aDGYbMmnLVNAzAVCOH2LrKBLdLeZKsEK+HbnKttMMk9Zaip5ZgHKAdyzar6+fH5pxRD2aT B5CNa2Dm1eC2WHixbfaNW2846gc2esAnL55y9rV/Mh7a6BqcB1I+PQicYm3w0586uhVMHl +ozcno0BYNCvffPVIWV4LoKRIwk2wG63nXG+bhPM1Y8VtfS4ZV6YYVVulQcWsVoSomDmHp NtgDL5eze2NIG4PZqwHlkZLm/87frebK0+7r4BcYZXK+ulflPlteseb9kP5lrqCu/bUL4p mBZxrtfhb7QfPpwirq6CX75pVGzhN1tms9bWrVL2zWIRh2Z7L229J7+equcafg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614592570; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OOVk8qsOat0OiSsyF4nSKgzVRvXetIa6N5AevwBVVYpM3x84i+LCXTNCNT59IMLeCIzXeK eMMiGFt4nCcqQsYekS9jiA/GYybQYU36Jv4crUPjfny7IxIPbZF2FaAbpAq12P/rk9iKRf dNQotuXx1Bkjn6S+wsLLpL8tAExnr9+3vr13NbVYFD9BNQtA4lT40NprQr7Huz7wmjBHrx 9AGhZkC+M3vjGiYUT2h4VHZ562xyXM+MSurFxMdvBPutknR3GVD1Jj9CU+BZj1Kui2gtf3 0zJfOVZKD4Jh4XfXtGYJG39R3NjwT3IER0u4diYtMemP98dwVJM/Ag8+lfeJFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.87 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 4002527E4F X-Spam-Score: -2.87 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: pGGj+NokxOLl Hi, Maxim Cournoyer skribis: > We should patch GnuTLS so that it also honors the SSL_* environment > variables documented in the Guix manual. Note that (1) the SSL_* variables are originally from OpenSSL, and (2) GnuTLS developers made the conscious decision to not honor any environment variable, leaving it up to application developers to do that. That=E2=80=99s the reason we are in this situation. See the thread at . Now, I agree it=E2=80=99s inconvenient for those applications that don=E2= =80=99t do anything. Perhaps we should check if it=E2=80=99s reasonable to report it upstream when we encounter such issues, or if there=E2=80=99s just too many= of them? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.