unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: 48024@debbugs.gnu.org, raingloom <raingloom@riseup.net>
Subject: bug#48024: glib-2.62.6 build fails i686
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 12:34:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y2cti1gp.fsf@disroot.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eeennocl.fsf@netris.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1806 bytes --]

Mark H Weaver writes:
> Did you also run "make"?

I have now.

> Hmm.  Can you please grep the build log for "TIMEOUT" and
> "increase-test-timeout", and show me the matching lines?

"increase-test-timeout":
```
starting phase `increase-test-timeout'
phase `increase-test-timeout' succeeded after 0.1 seconds
```

"TIMEOUT":
```
 53/259 glib:glib / rec-mutex                   TIMEOUT 120.03 s
 83/259 glib:glib / 1bit-mutex                  TIMEOUT 120.02 s 
 84/259 glib:glib+slow / 1bit-emufutex          TIMEOUT 180.05 s
```

Attached is the build log.

>>> (Incidentally, I *always* use Guix this way, using my own private branch
>>> of Guix, never using "guix pull", and never using substitutes.)
>>
>> This is interesting to me.
>
> I outlined how I use Guix in the following message:
>
>   https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-03/msg00625.html
>
> However, note that there are some significant caveats and "rough edges"
> to this approach.  I can't recommend it in good conscience, unless you
> truly need the extreme flexibility that it provides.
>
> To avoid the rough edges, I'd suggest using "guix pull --url" as
> outlined in the last two paragraphs of the message above.  For most
> purposes, I suspect you'd be much happier with that approach.

Thank you for sharing this.  Also thank you for the warning about 'significant caveats and "rough edges"'.

As a new user of Guix I think I will initially try to use the official
Guix repository.

However the message from Tobias Geerinckx-Rice in
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/48213 gives me the idea that your flexible
approach could be very useful if I find myself in a situation where I
have an issue that will not be addressed by an upstream project and
that has too much of a maintenance burden for Guix maintainers to take
on.


[-- Attachment #2: 1kqwp7fsdphlkg75x0bhyw5m49y41d-glib-2.62.6.drv.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 26242 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-05 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-26  3:35 bug#48024: glib-2.62.6 build fails i686 Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-04-26 15:26 ` raingloom
2021-04-27 19:25   ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-04-28  3:23     ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-03 22:00       ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-05-04  0:38         ` Leo Famulari
2021-05-04  3:01         ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-04  6:18           ` Efraim Flashner
2021-05-04 20:01             ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-04 20:08               ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-04 22:52               ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-05-05  8:38               ` Efraim Flashner
2021-05-05 21:15                 ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-05-06  0:20                   ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-06  0:35                     ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-05-06  6:45                   ` Efraim Flashner
2021-05-06  9:06                     ` Bengt Richter
2021-05-06 17:44                     ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix
2021-05-07 17:46                       ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-08 13:26                         ` Bengt Richter
2022-03-18  2:26                     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-05-04  3:56         ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-05 16:34           ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix [this message]
2021-05-06  8:46             ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-06 19:36               ` Bone Baboon via Bug reports for GNU Guix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y2cti1gp.fsf@disroot.org \
    --to=bug-guix@gnu.org \
    --cc=48024@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=bone.baboon@disroot.org \
    --cc=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=raingloom@riseup.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).