From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Integration of the Nix daemon
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:25:49 +0100
Message-ID: <87wqwg48pe.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zk1u3htq.fsf@gnu.org> <201212161216.51858.andreas@enge.fr>
	<87zk1c5qht.fsf@gnu.org> <201212172248.58544.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41818)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Tkj8S-0003ay-GW
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:26:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1Tkj8Q-0000mn-4v
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:26:08 -0500
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]:32818)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1Tkj8P-0000mg-Ua
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:26:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <201212172248.58544.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:48:58 +0100")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Montag, 17. Dezember 2012 schrieb Ludovic Court=C3=A8s:
>> It just occurred to me: here nixbld1 and nixbld10 have the same UID,
>> which is wrong.  Can you check whether the others have a different UID?
>
> Silly me! I think that was it, a simple copy-and-paste error. Sorry for
> taking your time.

Good to know.  :-)

> Strangely enough, the same setting worked for the nix daemon.

Hmm, interesting.  We=E2=80=99d have to follow the logic in libstore/build.=
cc...

> Did anything in the base system change? I find myself redownloading gcc
> and so on. Or does the switch to guix-daemon trigger a rebuild?

Normally core packages didn=E2=80=99t change on =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.