unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in>
Cc: 16463@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#16463: Guile derivation fails to build
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:32:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqhzijuf.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D7CB7F.9060403@totakura.in> (Sree Harsha Totakura's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:07:27 +0100")

Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in> skribis:

> Guile derivation seems to fail during `make check`.  I am not sure why
> Guile is even being built; all I did was to execute `guix package
> install=hello`.  Perhaps guile is one of the (indirect) dependencies for
> hello?

Yes, it’s a dependency for everything.  See the “Bootstrapping” node of
the manual.

> and hydra.gnu.org was unresponsive for some reason..

Yes, that’s often the case unfortunately, but it just means it’s a bit
slow.

> make[5]: Entering directory '/tmp/nix-build-guile-2.0.9.drv-0/guile-2.0.9/test-suite/standalone'
> PASS: test-system-cmds
> PASS: test-bad-identifiers
> PASS: test-require-extension
> PASS: test-guile-snarf
> PASS: test-import-order
> PASS: test-command-line-encoding
> Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>  157: 8 [catch #t #<catch-closure 204dd80> ...]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 7 [apply-smob/1 #<catch-closure 204dd80>]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   63: 6 [call-with-prompt prompt0 ...]
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>  432: 5 [eval # #]
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 2320: 4 [save-module-excursion #<procedure 207ccc0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3961:3 ()>]
> 3966: 3 [#<procedure 207ccc0 at ice-9/boot-9.scm:3961:3 ()>]
> 1645: 2 [%start-stack load-stack ...]
> 1650: 1 [#<procedure 207b060 ()>]
> In unknown file:
>    ?: 0 [primitive-load "/tmp/nix-build-guile-2.0.9.drv-0/guile-2.0.9/test-suite/standalone/test-command-line-encoding2"]
>
> ERROR: In procedure primitive-load:
> ERROR: In procedure open_iconv_descriptors: invalid or unknown character encoding "ISO-"
> FAIL: test-command-line-encoding2

This is very weird.  Is it reproducible?  Does ‘guix-daemon’ use the
chroot, separate name spaces, and separate build users?

Does this fail in the same way?

  guix build -e '(@ (gnu packages base) guile-final)' -n

TIA,
Ludo’.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-16 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-16 12:07 bug#16463: Guile derivation fails to build Sree Harsha Totakura
2014-01-16 23:32 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2014-01-17  9:16   ` Sree Harsha Totakura
2014-01-17  9:42     ` Sree Harsha Totakura
2014-01-17 10:04       ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-17 10:13         ` Sree Harsha Totakura
2014-01-17 10:35           ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-17 10:44       ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-17 10:46         ` Sree Harsha Totakura
2014-01-17 11:08           ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wqhzijuf.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=16463@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=sreeharsha@totakura.in \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).